> I think as a first step, the deadlock detection should kick off after a > certain timeout, even if the transaction timeout was not set.
> What do you think? Dmitry, I thought that was what I suggested, no? =) --Yakov
> I think as a first step, the deadlock detection should kick off after a > certain timeout, even if the transaction timeout was not set.
> What do you think? Dmitry, I thought that was what I suggested, no? =) --Yakov