Hello Valentin,

The application you are probably referring to is user code from Stack
Overflow and its license is uncertain.

Moreover, this will require depending our tests on spring-mvc and
spring-security.

If that is acceptable, I could throw together a clean room implementation.
But I still think it tests too little for too much effort. What do you
think?

Regards,

-- 
Ilya Kasnacheev

2017-09-13 2:33 GMT+03:00 Valentin Kulichenko <[email protected]
>:

> Ilya,
>
> I see you have a fully-pledged application to test the scenario. Is it
> possible to include it (probably simplified a bit) into our tests suites so
> that it runs periodically? This will not only verify this particular fix,
> but also prevent us from other issues that may occur.
>
> -Val
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Val, can you please help?
> >
> > --Yakov
> >
> > 2017-09-12 14:30 GMT+03:00 Ilya Kasnacheev <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > Hello Igniters,
> > >
> > > It came to our attention that our handling of Web Sessions is
> > inconsistent:
> > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45648884/apache-
> > > ignite-spring-secutiry-error
> > >
> > > I've filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6070 and fixed
> > the
> > > issue in https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2621 (amended tests
> pass)
> > >
> > > Please step forward to review and possibly merge this change, as I
> could
> > > not locate any commiters familiar with Web Sessions directly.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ilya Kasnacheev
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to