That's a very useful suggestion. Can it be supported for other APIs as well, not only transactions?
-Val On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for withTag() > > ср, 4 окт. 2017 г. в 17:19, Yakov Zhdanov <[email protected]>: > > > Really like .withTag() suggestion! > > > > --Yakov > > >
