Simplified:
Current flow is over-complicated for me as developer, I see a lot of
problems and have no clue how to fix them using readme.io or wiki.
But I know how to fix them using git.
I'm good at git, let me write documentation in way I'm good in :)


On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org>
wrote:

> > easy to use editor
> Honestly, it sucks.
> I want to use my IDE and git instead of slow and buggy browser-based bs.
>
> > commit changes
> This is a good thing. I want to commit changes, see history, do other VCS
> stuff.
>
> > Github is also a third-party site
> I don't suggest github.
> We store code in Apache git [1], and we should store docs there as well,
> as most projects do.
>
> This way documentation can be developed, reviewed and merged with exactly
> the same process as used for code, which is great.
>
> ignite.apache.org should be used for hosting.
> Documentation release will be the same as source/binary/javadoc release:
> just push things to SVN.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Pavel
>
>
> [1] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/ignite
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Pavel,
> >
> > The lack of smooth versioning between pages on readme.io <
> > http://readme.io/> is redeemed with an easy to use editor. A doc writer
> > don’t need to grasp any markup language, commit changes to some remote
> repo
> > and check up final results. All the writer needs to do is to open a page
> > and update it seeing the changes immediately.
> >
> > Github is also a third-party site, so the docs won’t be hosted on ASF
> > infrastructure anyway.
> >
> > As a the one who prepares docs frequently, I can live with readme.io <
> > http://readme.io/>.
> >
> > —
> > Denis
> >
> > > On Oct 31, 2017, at 2:35 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Denis,
> > >
> > > Are there plans to move away from readme.io?
> > >
> > > * It is not properly versioned, which is very painful
> > > * Documentation should be in Apache git, not on some third party site
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Good point. Renamed:
> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+to+Document <
> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+to+Document>
> > >>
> > >> —
> > >> Denis
> > >>
> > >>> On Oct 30, 2017, at 12:37 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> dsetrak...@apache.org
> > >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks Denis! Any change we can rename the page to "How to
> Document?".
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Igniters,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Our project is broadly documented so it’s becoming harder and harder
> > to
> > >>>> keep the docs consistent and updated. During several last months we
> > >> tried
> > >>>> the new approach with some of community members and took it down on
> > >> paper:
> > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Documentation
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Please read it through and keep to it going forward or propose your
> > >>>> changes if you’re like. Presently this approach proved to be
> > effective.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> —
> > >>>> Denis
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to