Val,

Tests should be attached to appropriate suites and muted if necessary,
Issues should be created on each mute.

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 7:23 PM, Valentin Kulichenko <
valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Anton,
>
> I tend to agree with Ilya that identifying and fixing all the possible
> broken tests in one go is not feasible. What is the proper way in your
> view? What are you suggesting?
>
> -Val
>
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:18 AM, Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Ilya,
> >
> > 1) Still see no reason for such changes. Does this break something?
> >
> > 2) Looks like you're trying to add Trash*TestSuite.java which will never
> be
> > refactored.
> > We should do everything in proper way now, not sometime.
> >
> > 3) Your comments looks odd to me.
> > Issue should be resolved in proper way.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 1:07 PM, Ilya Kasnacheev <
> ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Anton,
> > >
> > > 1) We already have ~100 files named "*AbstractTest.java". Renaming
> these
> > > several files will help checking for orphaned tests in the future, as
> > well
> > > as increasing code base consistency.
> > >
> > > 2) This is huge work that is not doable by any single developer. While
> > > IgniteLostAndFoundTestSuite can be slowly refactored away
> > > This is unless you are OK with putting all these tests, most of which
> are
> > > red and some are hanging, in production test suites and therefore
> > breaking
> > > productivity for a couple months while this gets sorted.
> > > Are you OK with that? Anybody else?
> > >
> > > 3) I think I *could* put them in some test suite or another, but I'm
> > pretty
> > > sure I can't fix them all, not in one commit, not ever. Nobody can do
> > that
> > > single-handedly. We need a plan here.
> > >
> > > Ilya.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ilya Kasnacheev
> > >
> > > 2018-02-05 13:00 GMT+03:00 Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com
> >:
> > >
> > > > Ilya,
> > > >
> > > > 1) I don't think it's a good idea to rename classes to
> > *AbstractTest.java
> > > > since they already have abstract word at definition.
> > > > We can perform such renaming only in case whole project will be
> > > refactored,
> > > > but I see no reason to do this.
> > > >
> > > > 2) All not included test should be included to appropriate siutes.
> > > > Creating IgniteLostAndFoundTestSuite,java is not acceptable.
> > > >
> > > > 3) In case you're not sure what to do with particular tests, please
> > > provide
> > > > lists of such tests. Please group tests by "problem".
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:28 AM, Dmitry Pavlov <
> dpavlov....@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Ilya,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for this research. I think it is useful for community to
> > > > identify
> > > > > and remove obsolete tests (if any), and include lost test into CI
> run
> > > > chain
> > > > > (if applicable).
> > > > >
> > > > > For test with main() methods I suggest to ask authors (git
> annotate)
> > > and
> > > > if
> > > > > there is no response probably we should remove such code.
> > > > >
> > > > > Since I am not sure all tests in this lost&found suite are quite
> > > stable I
> > > > > suggest to create standalone TC Run configuration for such tests.
> > > > >
> > > > > Earlier I've removed most of tests causing timeouts from basic
> suite.
> > > > > Ideally Basic suite should contain fast run quite stable tests (
> and
> > 0
> > > > > flaky ) because it is included into RunAllBasic sub set to brief
> > commit
> > > > > check  (
> > > > > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=
> > > > IgniteTests24Java8_
> > > > > RunBasicTests
> > > > >  ).
> > > > >
> > > > > Sincerely,
> > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > > >
> > > > > чт, 1 февр. 2018 г. в 20:22, Ilya Kasnacheev <
> > > ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com
> > > > >:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > While working on Ignite, I have noticed that not all tests are in
> > any
> > > > > test
> > > > > > suite, hence I expect they are ignored. I have also noticed some
> > > files
> > > > in
> > > > > > src/test and named *Test.java are actually runnable main-classes
> > and
> > > > not
> > > > > > tests. I think they're ignored to. Also I've noticed that 6 tests
> > > > repeat
> > > > > > twice.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have tried to fix it by introducing "lost and found" test
> suite.
> > > Not
> > > > > sure
> > > > > > what to do with main-classes. I have also renamed abstract test
> > > classes
> > > > > to
> > > > > > *AbstractTest.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please consider pull request https://github.com/apache/
> > > > ignite/pull/3464
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have started this suite on TC but I expect it to hang or worse.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=1071504&;
> > > > > tab=queuedBuildOverviewTab
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Ilya Kasnacheev
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to