Denis, You're proposing changes without viewing a code :)
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:07 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > Anton, > > What’s wrong if we just go ahead and: > - replace “fabric” with “ignite” > - replace “hadoop” with “ignite-hadoop" > > — > Denis > > > On Feb 8, 2018, at 1:51 AM, Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com> > wrote: > > > > Denis, > > > > "hadoop" and "fabric" words work on same engine. > > > > We have special assembly desctiptors, for example: > > dependencies-fabric.xml > > dependencies-fabric-lgpl.xml > > dependencies-hadoop.xml > > release-base.xml > > release-fabric.xml > > release-fabric-base.xml > > release-fabric-lgpl.xml > > release-hadoop.xml > > > > So, I'ts impossible for now to remove "fabric" without "hadoop" removal. > > Only one case is to make some ditry hack, but that's not a good idea. > > > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com> > wrote: > > > >> +1 hadoop accelerator removing for AI 2.5 > >> > >> Also probably IGFS should be either removed or refactored, e.g. create > FS > >> directly over the data region without using "cache" entity as an > >> intermidiate stage > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:13 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >>> Anton, > >>> > >>> I don’t get how the hadoop editions are related to this task. The > project > >>> is not named as “data fabric” for a while. Check up the site or docs. > >>> > >>> The “fabric” word is being removed from all over the places and needs > to > >>> be removed from the editions’ names. > >>> > >>> As for the hadoop future, my personal position is to retire this > >> component > >>> and forget about it. I would restart the conversation again after we > done > >>> with 2.4. > >>> > >>> — > >>> Denis > >>> > >>>> On Feb 7, 2018, at 2:13 AM, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Denis, Petr, > >>>> > >>>> I checked PR and found we have *overcomplicated* logic with "fabric" > >> and > >>>> "hadoop" postfixs. > >>>> > >>>> Do we really need to assembly 2 editions? > >>>> "Hadoop" edition still valued? > >>>> > >>>> My proposal is to get rid of "hadoop" edition and replace it with > >>>> instruction of how to use "fabric" edition instead. > >>>> Instruction will be pretty easy -> move "hadoop" folder from > "optional" > >>> to > >>>> root directory :) > >>>> > >>>> In that case we can just remove all postfix logic from maven poms and > >>>> simplify release process. > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Petr, thanks for solving it! > >>>>> > >>>>> Hope that Anton V. or some other build master will double-check the > >>>>> changes and merge them. > >>>>> > >>>>> — > >>>>> Denis > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Dec 28, 2017, at 8:29 AM, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> IGNITE-7251 is done, needs review and some additional tests. See PR > >>>>> #3315 [1]. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3315 < > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3315> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 20 Dec 2017, at 23:15, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Petr, thanks, such a swift turnaround! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Have you found the one who can asses and review the changes? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Maintainers label might be helpful. Just ping them directly: > >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+ > >>>>> to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-ReviewProcessandMaintainers < > >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+ > >>>>> to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-ReviewProcessandMaintainers> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> — > >>>>>>> Denis > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Dec 20, 2017, at 12:24 AM, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Assigned myself — done the same work while preparing RPM package. > >>>>>>>> But for fixing DEVNOTES.txt waiting for review and merge of > >>>>> IGNITE-7107 [1]. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7107 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On 19 Dec 2017, at 22:55, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> All the bids were accepted and the verdict is executed: > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7251 < > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7251> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Who is ready to pick this up? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> — > >>>>>>>>> Denis > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2017, at 5:35 AM, Anton Vinogradov < > >>>>> avinogra...@gridgain.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> +1б фо шур > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Vladimir Ozerov < > >>>>> voze...@gridgain.com> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> +1б вуаштшеудн > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Valentin Kulichenko < > >>>>>>>>>>> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > >>>>>>>>>>> dsetrak...@apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (completely agree) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Denis Magda < > >>> dma...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Ignite binary releases still include “fabric” word in > >>>>> their > >>>>>>>>>>>> names: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ignite.apache.org/download.cgi#binaries < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ignite.apache.org/download.cgi#binaries> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For instance, this is a full name of the previous release - > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache-ignite-fabric-2.3.0-bin. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It’s a little oversight on our side because the project has > >> not > >>>>> been > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> positioned as a fabric for a while. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposal! Remove “fabric” from the name and have the binary > >>>>> releases > >>>>>>>>>>>>> named > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as - apache-ignite-{version}-bin. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we’re in consensus then let’s make the change in 2.4. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Sergey Kozlov > >> GridGain Systems > >> www.gridgain.com > >> > >
