Yakov,

I see the only one problem with your suggestion - number of "uncheckpointed" segments is potentially unlimited. Right now we have limited number (10) of file segments with immutable names in WAL "work" directory. We have to keep this approach due to known bug in XFS - fsync time is nearly twice bigger for recently created files.


Best Regards,
Ivan Rakov

On 13.02.2018 21:22, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
I meant we still will be copying segment once and then will be moving it to
archive which should not affect file system much.

Thoughts?

--Yakov

2018-02-13 21:19 GMT+03:00 Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org>:

Alex,

I remember we had some confusing behavior for WAL archive when archived
segments were required for successful recovery.

Is issue still present?

If yes, what if we copy "uncheckpointed" segments to a directory under wal
directory and then move the segments to archive after checkpoint? Will this
work?

Thanks!

--Yakov


Reply via email to