Ilya, I guess we can remove all these suites
GridActivationAtomicCacheSuit GridActivationCacheAbstractTestSuit GridActivationLocalAndNearCacheSuit GridActivationPartitionedCacheSuit GridActivationReplicatedCacheSuit They became not relevant after standby mode became part of the basic functionality. On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 6:33 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> wrote: > Yakov, > > Agree. > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 6:11 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Alexey Goncharuk, Vladimir Ozerov, what do you think about these tests? > > > > I believe they were created as a part of variuos optimization and > profiling > > activities. I also think we can remove them since nobody cares about them > > for too long. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Yakov Zhdanov > > > > ср, 18 апр. 2018 г., 16:42 Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > I've decided to return to this task after a break. > > > > > > Can you please tell me why do we have main-class tests? Such as > > > > > > GridBasicPerformanceTest.class, > > > GridBenchmarkCacheGetLoadTest.class, > > > GridBoundedConcurrentLinkedHashSetLoadTest.class, > > > GridCacheDataStructuresLoadTest.class, > > > GridCacheReplicatedPreloadUndeploysTest.class, > > > GridCacheLoadTest.class, > > > GridCacheMultiNodeDataStructureTest.class, > > > GridCapacityLoadTest.class, > > > GridContinuousOperationsLoadTest.class, > > > GridFactoryVmShutdownTest.class, > > > GridFutureListenPerformanceTest.class, > > > GridFutureQueueTest.class, > > > GridGcTimeoutTest.class, > > > GridJobExecutionSingleNodeLoadTest.class, > > > GridJobExecutionSingleNodeSemaphoreLoadTest.class, > > > GridJobLoadTest.class, > > > GridMergeSortLoadTest.class, > > > GridNioBenchmarkTest.class, > > > GridThreadPriorityTest.class, > > > GridSystemCurrentTimeMillisTest.class, > > > BlockingQueueTest.class, > > > MultipleFileIOTest.class, > > > GridSingleExecutionTest.class > > > > > > > > > If nobody wants them, how about we delete them in master branch? Start > > > afresh? > > > > > > -- > > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > > > > 2018-02-13 17:02 GMT+03:00 Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com > >: > > > > > > > Anton, > > > > > > > > >Tests should be attached to appropriate suites > > > > > > > > This I can do > > > > > > > > > and muted if necessary, Issues should be created on each mute. > > > > > > > > This is roughly a week of work. I can't spare that right now. I doubt > > > > anyone can. > > > > > > > > Can we approach this by smaller steps? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > > > > > > 2018-02-06 19:55 GMT+03:00 Anton Vinogradov < > avinogra...@gridgain.com > > >: > > > > > > > >> Val, > > > >> > > > >> Tests should be attached to appropriate suites and muted if > necessary, > > > >> Issues should be created on each mute. > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 7:23 PM, Valentin Kulichenko < > > > >> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Anton, > > > >> > > > > >> > I tend to agree with Ilya that identifying and fixing all the > > possible > > > >> > broken tests in one go is not feasible. What is the proper way in > > your > > > >> > view? What are you suggesting? > > > >> > > > > >> > -Val > > > >> > > > > >> > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:18 AM, Anton Vinogradov < > > > >> avinogra...@gridgain.com > > > >> > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > Ilya, > > > >> > > > > > >> > > 1) Still see no reason for such changes. Does this break > > something? > > > >> > > > > > >> > > 2) Looks like you're trying to add Trash*TestSuite.java which > will > > > >> never > > > >> > be > > > >> > > refactored. > > > >> > > We should do everything in proper way now, not sometime. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > 3) Your comments looks odd to me. > > > >> > > Issue should be resolved in proper way. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 1:07 PM, Ilya Kasnacheev < > > > >> > ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Anton, > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > 1) We already have ~100 files named "*AbstractTest.java". > > Renaming > > > >> > these > > > >> > > > several files will help checking for orphaned tests in the > > future, > > > >> as > > > >> > > well > > > >> > > > as increasing code base consistency. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > 2) This is huge work that is not doable by any single > developer. > > > >> While > > > >> > > > IgniteLostAndFoundTestSuite can be slowly refactored away > > > >> > > > This is unless you are OK with putting all these tests, most > of > > > >> which > > > >> > are > > > >> > > > red and some are hanging, in production test suites and > > therefore > > > >> > > breaking > > > >> > > > productivity for a couple months while this gets sorted. > > > >> > > > Are you OK with that? Anybody else? > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > 3) I think I *could* put them in some test suite or another, > but > > > I'm > > > >> > > pretty > > > >> > > > sure I can't fix them all, not in one commit, not ever. Nobody > > can > > > >> do > > > >> > > that > > > >> > > > single-handedly. We need a plan here. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Ilya. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > -- > > > >> > > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > 2018-02-05 13:00 GMT+03:00 Anton Vinogradov < > > > >> avinogra...@gridgain.com > > > >> > >: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Ilya, > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > 1) I don't think it's a good idea to rename classes to > > > >> > > *AbstractTest.java > > > >> > > > > since they already have abstract word at definition. > > > >> > > > > We can perform such renaming only in case whole project will > > be > > > >> > > > refactored, > > > >> > > > > but I see no reason to do this. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > 2) All not included test should be included to appropriate > > > siutes. > > > >> > > > > Creating IgniteLostAndFoundTestSuite,java is not > acceptable. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > 3) In case you're not sure what to do with particular tests, > > > >> please > > > >> > > > provide > > > >> > > > > lists of such tests. Please group tests by "problem". > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:28 AM, Dmitry Pavlov < > > > >> > dpavlov....@gmail.com> > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi Ilya, > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Thank you for this research. I think it is useful for > > > community > > > >> to > > > >> > > > > identify > > > >> > > > > > and remove obsolete tests (if any), and include lost test > > into > > > >> CI > > > >> > run > > > >> > > > > chain > > > >> > > > > > (if applicable). > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > For test with main() methods I suggest to ask authors (git > > > >> > annotate) > > > >> > > > and > > > >> > > > > if > > > >> > > > > > there is no response probably we should remove such code. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Since I am not sure all tests in this lost&found suite are > > > quite > > > >> > > > stable I > > > >> > > > > > suggest to create standalone TC Run configuration for such > > > >> tests. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Earlier I've removed most of tests causing timeouts from > > basic > > > >> > suite. > > > >> > > > > > Ideally Basic suite should contain fast run quite stable > > > tests ( > > > >> > and > > > >> > > 0 > > > >> > > > > > flaky ) because it is included into RunAllBasic sub set to > > > brief > > > >> > > commit > > > >> > > > > > check ( > > > >> > > > > > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId= > > > >> > > > > IgniteTests24Java8_ > > > >> > > > > > RunBasicTests > > > >> > > > > > ). > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Sincerely, > > > >> > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > чт, 1 февр. 2018 г. в 20:22, Ilya Kasnacheev < > > > >> > > > ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com > > > >> > > > > >: > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hello! > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > While working on Ignite, I have noticed that not all > tests > > > >> are in > > > >> > > any > > > >> > > > > > test > > > >> > > > > > > suite, hence I expect they are ignored. I have also > > noticed > > > >> some > > > >> > > > files > > > >> > > > > in > > > >> > > > > > > src/test and named *Test.java are actually runnable > > > >> main-classes > > > >> > > and > > > >> > > > > not > > > >> > > > > > > tests. I think they're ignored to. Also I've noticed > that > > 6 > > > >> tests > > > >> > > > > repeat > > > >> > > > > > > twice. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I have tried to fix it by introducing "lost and found" > > test > > > >> > suite. > > > >> > > > Not > > > >> > > > > > sure > > > >> > > > > > > what to do with main-classes. I have also renamed > abstract > > > >> test > > > >> > > > classes > > > >> > > > > > to > > > >> > > > > > > *AbstractTest. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Please consider pull request https://github.com/apache/ > > > >> > > > > ignite/pull/3464 > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I have started this suite on TC but I expect it to hang > or > > > >> worse. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/ > > viewLog.html?buildId=1071504& > > > >> > > > > > tab=queuedBuildOverviewTab > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Regards, > > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > >> > > > > > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
