Pavel, This is about concurrent usage of the same connection (client) by several threads.
By the ways guys, I wanted to ask you, if your clients support this feature, as I was not sure. I mean, protocol seems to be designed to support such use-case, but I was not sure about clients. Best Regards, Igor On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Igor, > > Thanks for creating this! > One question: what is `Multithreading` feature? > > Pavel > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> wrote: > > > Igor, > > > > That's a valid point. Will see how it goes. As for the new documentation > > engine, there are no more arguments. We will try to migrate within 2.6. > > Just need to find more contributors who would help with this. > > > > -- > > Denis > > > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Thanks for proposals, guys, I will do this. > > > > > > Denis, > > > Readme.io is not very convenient for some big tables. They look OK, > > > while they have 3-4 columns, but if we are going to add more clients > > > (or should I say "when") it is going to be a mess. This may be a one > > > more argument when we consider to change documentation engine. > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Igor > > > > > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:37 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Igor, thanks for putting together the page. > > >> > > >> As for the immediate improvements, I'm backing up Alexey's > suggestions. > > >> > > >> This page deserves to be moved to the readme.io. We'll do that once > > it's > > >> sorted out how to group the thin clients' documentation. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Denis > > >> > > >> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Alexey Kosenchuk < > > >> alexey.kosenc...@nobitlost.com> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi Igor, > > >>> > > >>> "Get Binary Cache" (if it is about getting a complex object in a > > >>> "binary" form, w/o deserialization) - is supported by NodeJS: > > >>> BinaryObject is returned for a complex object if an app has not > > >>> specified another JavaScript Object for deserialization. > > >>> > > >>> Maybe worth to add type registration functionality: > > >>> - complex object type registration (supported by NodeJS) > > >>> - enum type registration (not supported by NodeJS) > > >>> - type name registration (not supported by NodeJS) > > >>> > > >>> Also, maybe add a list of all type codes, supported for read and > write. > > >>> But not sure, as all of them are supported by all three clients. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> -Alexey > > >>> > > >>> 14.05.2018 22:06, Igor Sapego пишет: > > >>> > > >>> Hello Igniters, > > >>>> > > >>>> I've created a new page in wiki, that summarizes a features > > >>>> availability of thin clients. It should help us to plan development > > >>>> of thin clients while also helping out users to understand a state > > >>>> of clients. > > >>>> > > >>>> Check it out and tell me what you think. And if there are some > > >>>> mistakes, don't hesitate telling me. > > >>>> > > >>>> [1] - > > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Thin+clie > > >>>> nts+features > > >>>> > > >>>> Best Regards, > > >>>> Igor > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > > > >
