Thanks to all for participating the discussion.

I've updated [1]: now it requires new handler from [2] for completion.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9660
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8227

чт, 20 сент. 2018 г. в 21:56, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>:

> Stop node handler is not very good choice. Some test will continue work as
> usual even if some node failed. E.g. SQL queries with backups may continue
> function in some cases, especially if these are test with REPLICATED cache.
>
> New test-scope handler looks like a better candidate to me.
>
> чт, 20 сент. 2018 г. в 21:22, Andrey Kuznetsov <stku...@gmail.com>:
>
> > I meant the first comment in [1]. We are to decide first whether we'll do
> > it or not.
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8227
> > <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8227?focusedCommentId=16435298&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16435298
> > >
> >
> > чт, 20 сент. 2018 г. в 21:18, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Sorry, incomplete message.
> > >
> > > Why do you think there is no consensus?
> > >
> > > I have no clue what can be a reason for another approach.
> > > By default failure handler should fail all test.
> > >
> > > Failure handlers test will be always a minority of tests, so fail
> handler
> > > call is something abnormal.
> > >
> > > чт, 20 сент. 2018 г. в 21:15, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > Why do you think there is no consensus?
> > > >
> > > > I have no clue that by default failure handler should fail all test.
> > > >
> > > > чт, 20 сент. 2018 г. в 21:10, Andrey Kuznetsov <stku...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > >> I've created [1] to address this.
> > > >>
> > > >> Dmitriy, I like your idea of creating special test-scope handler.
> But
> > > >> there
> > > >> is no consensus about it, so I don't want to rely on that potential
> > > >> handler
> > > >> right now. We can switch to it later, of course.
> > > >>
> > > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9660
> > > >>
> > > >> чт, 20 сент. 2018 г. в 20:03, Maxim Muzafarov <maxmu...@gmail.com>:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Andrey,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I like your idea.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > After changing the default node failure handler to the new one we
> > > should
> > > >> > carefully review the whole new test failures. For instance,
> calling
> > > this
> > > >> > method in tests should not lead test to the node being stopped:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > <strong>FOR TEST ONLY!!!</strong>
> > > >> > TcpDiscoverySpi#simulateNodeFailure
> > > >> >
> > > >> > BTW, I would like to remove this method at all from production
> code.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 19:43 Dmitriy Pavlov <
> dpavlov....@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > But the totally ideal situation would be finding a way to fail
> the
> > > >> test
> > > >> > by
> > > >> > > default, not only stopping a node.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Some time ago I've created
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8227 to
> > > >> > > find out a way to do so.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > чт, 20 сент. 2018 г. в 19:40, Dmitriy Pavlov <
> > dpavlov....@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > ++1
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > чт, 20 сент. 2018 г. в 19:39, Andrey Kuznetsov <
> > stku...@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> Igniters,
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> While running tests I see a lot of ignored critical failures
> > > >> caused by
> > > >> > > >> {{NoOpFailureHandler}} that we use by default. In some tests,
> > of
> > > >> > cource,
> > > >> > > >> critical failures are the part of normal workflow, but in the
> > > >> majority
> > > >> > > of
> > > >> > > >> tests they indicate bugs. By using {{NoOpFailureHandler}} we
> > just
> > > >> hide
> > > >> > > >> these bugs from ourselves.
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> What do you think about changing default handler to
> > > >> > > >> {{StopNodeFailureHandler}} at {{GridAbstractTest}} level?
> This
> > > >> could
> > > >> > be
> > > >> > > >> overridden in subclasses.
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> --
> > > >> > > >> Best regards,
> > > >> > > >>   Andrey Kuznetsov.
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Maxim Muzafarov
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Best regards,
> > > >>   Andrey Kuznetsov.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >   Andrey Kuznetsov.
> >
>


-- 
Best regards,
  Andrey Kuznetsov.

Reply via email to