My point we can wait a bit for services because
1  we are open-minded and we don't have outside pressure to do release in
October
2  and services it is not some new feature, which suddenly appeared in
autumn, it is a well known and important feature.

So it is up to Vyacheslav, Anton and Nikolay to decide.

Decisions can be services are not ready/ready to merge only to master/ready
to merge to master and to 2.7.


пт, 28 сент. 2018 г. в 10:46, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>:

> Dmitry,
>
> Community agreement was to perform the release in October. Of course we can
> wait a bit for services. Then we wait a bit for other cool features ready
> by that time, then again and again, and release will never happen. And
> while we are waiting for new features to come, already completerd features
> cannot be used by anyone.
>
> This is why we have an agreement that if feature is not ready, it should be
> moved to future release, instead of shifting release. The sole reason to
> have strict dates when decisions are made is to let release happen.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 2:22 AM Dmitriy Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Vladimir,  I'm not searching for enemy, and not fighting with you. I'm
> not
> > happy about cases when we are hurrying.
> >
> > We can't fix test, fill ticket details, can't wait for contributions to
> > finish their tasks.  It is not best idea to use experience from
> commercial
> > companies in open source. Are there any pressure outside community? Did
> > someone promised rest of features to be released at 30 September?
> >
> > Let's remember principle do-orcracy, power of those who do. If contribor
> > does change and reviewer does review, let's give right of making decision
> > to them, but not to some closed club of people who privately discuss
> > something.
> >
> > Sincerely
> > Dmitriy Pavlov
> >
> > чт, 27 сент. 2018 г., 23:42 Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Hi Igniters!
> > >
> > > As I have written about Service Grid before [1] I'm finalizing the
> > > solution to be sure that implementation is reliable.
> > >
> > > About including it in 2.7, if we talk that code freeze tomorrow then
> > > the solution is not ready to merge yet.
> > > I hope that prereviewers Anton Vinogradov and Nikolay Izhikov will be
> > > able to answer if solution out of scope or not in a couple of days.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Ignite-2-7-release-td34076.html#a34485
> > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:14 PM Dmitriy Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I agree, NPE during WAL flush is definitely a blocker.
> > > >
> > > > It is strange why the current test set did not fail after commit.
> > > >
> > > > чт, 27 сент. 2018 г. в 21:45, Andrey Kuznetsov <stku...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > Igniters,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've bumped into a new bug in WAL manager recently, see [1]. It
> looks
> > > > > critical enough, and can be a good candidate for fixing before 2.7
> > > release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you agree?
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9731
> > > > >
> > > > > чт, 27 сент. 2018 г. в 19:45, Dmitriy Pavlov <
> dpavlov....@gmail.com
> > >:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I need Vhyacheslav's opinion to be absolutely sure what status is
> > > now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We never committed to dates of release, as well. I don't quite
> > > understand
> > > > > > what can mean 'the community committed to doing/releasing
> > something'.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > About SG, I also concerned why such a big feature has quite a few
> > > > > > discussions on the list. But it is another story.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > чт, 27 сент. 2018 г. в 19:33, Vladimir Ozerov <
> > voze...@gridgain.com
> > > >:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Folks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please stop looking for enemies everywhere. Just went through
> > this
> > > > > thread
> > > > > > > and search for "service" word.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 7:30 PM Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Denis, as PMC Chair, could you please control, that Service
> > Grid
> > > > > > >> > inclusion/exclusion is discussed properly according to the
> > > Apache
> > > > > Way.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> It's fine when committers/contributors have private
> discussions
> > > > > related
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > >> a feature they've been working on. Not everything should go
> > > through
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >> dev
> > > > > > >> list. Otherwise, it will be inundated.  However, agree, that
> > > > > > architectural
> > > > > > >> and release decisions need to be done publicly.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Speaking about Service Grid, there was a discussion where I
> saw
> > > that
> > > > > it
> > > > > > >> was
> > > > > > >> questionable whether it gets added to the release or not.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> *Vladislav*, could you please shed some light on the current
> > > status of
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > >> service grid?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 9:12 AM Dmitriy Pavlov <
> > > dpavlov....@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > Ok, let's wait for feedback from SG Author(s)/Reviewer(s)
> > > first. If
> > > > > it
> > > > > > >> is
> > > > > > >> > not ready, ok. But I thought it is almost done.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > I apologize if I missed some discussion (it can happen), but
> > > > > > >> > According to the statement "our current agreement"
> > > > > > >> > I can suspect some members are making some sort of private
> > > > > agreements,
> > > > > > >> and
> > > > > > >> > do not to discuss it on the list.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Let's build consensus here first, and then name an
> agreement.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Denis, as PMC Chair, could you please control, that Service
> > Grid
> > > > > > >> > inclusion/exclusion is discussed properly according to the
> > > Apache
> > > > > Way.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > чт, 27 сент. 2018 г. в 18:55, Vladimir Ozerov <
> > > voze...@gridgain.com
> > > > > >:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >> Dmitriy,
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> This is an outcome of current state of Service Grid - it is
> > not
> > > > > > ready.
> > > > > > >> We
> > > > > > >> >> never committed to have it to 2.7. Our goal was to try to
> > > include
> > > > > it
> > > > > > >> into
> > > > > > >> >> 2.7.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 6:48 PM Dmitriy Pavlov <
> > > > > > dpavlov....@gmail.com>
> > > > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> > Could you please provide a reference to some thread?
> > > Probably I
> > > > > > >> missed
> > > > > > >> >> it.
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > чт, 27 сент. 2018 г. в 18:46, Vladimir Ozerov <
> > > > > > voze...@gridgain.com
> > > > > > >> >:
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > > Our current agreement is that Service Grid is out of
> > scope.
> > > > > This
> > > > > > >> is a
> > > > > > >> >> > huge
> > > > > > >> >> > > feature, which hasn't entered review stage so far, We
> > will
> > > not
> > > > > be
> > > > > > >> >> able to
> > > > > > >> >> > > review/fix/test it properly.
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 6:32 PM Dmitriy Pavlov <
> > > > > > >> dpavlov....@gmail.com
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > I agree, and I prefer four weeks for stabilization*
> (1
> > > Oct -
> > > > > 29
> > > > > > >> Oct)
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > Do I understand it correctly: Service Grid is still
> in
> > > scope,
> > > > > > >> isn't
> > > > > > >> >> > it? I
> > > > > > >> >> > > > find it very important.
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > чт, 27 сент. 2018 г. в 18:28, Nikolay Izhikov <
> > > > > > >> nizhi...@apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> >:
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Hello, Vova.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Thank you for clear release status.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > I'm +1 for your proposal.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > чт, 27 сент. 2018 г., 18:25 Alexey Kuznetsov <
> > > > > > >> >> akuznet...@apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> > >:
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Vova,
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Huge +1 to do a stabilization.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > --
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Alexey Kuznetsov
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >   Andrey Kuznetsov.
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards, Vyacheslav D.
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to