I agree, that we should worry about users, but according User List we dont have significant number of ml users. I think that next 1-2 releases we could make changes in api and package structure
ср, 12 дек. 2018 г., 15:10 Dmitriy Pavlov dpav...@apache.org: > Hi Yuri, > > Would it affect users? > > Ignite-code has separation of API classes (not internal) and internal > stuff. Internal classes may be changed from version to version, but API > can't be renamed/moved/and so on. What about ML? > > Sincerely, > Dmitriy Pavlov > > вт, 11 дек. 2018 г. в 16:56, Yuriy Babak <y.ch...@gmail.com>: > > > Igniters, > > > > I want to discuss package structure for ML module. Actually I don't like > > our current package organization. The main problem is that we have lots > of > > different packages under root package. > > > > For examples algorithm related packages on same level like some utility > > infrastructure packages such as environment(package with some classes > > related with training environment). > > > > So I created branch [1] with example of new package structure. Please > share > > any feedback about this package structure and about this idea itself. > > > > Regards, > > Yuriy. > > > > [1] - > > > > > https://github.com/YuriBabak/ignite/tree/ignite-10641/modules/ml/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/ml > > >