Hello, Alexey. > But the > compatibility with Spark 2.3 will be broken, isn't it?
Yes. > Do you have any > plans to support the different version of Spark without loosing your unique > expertise in Spark-Ignite integration? What do you mean by "my unique expertise"? :) How do you see support of several Spark version? В Ср, 28/08/2019 в 14:29 +0300, Alexey Zinoviev пишет: > Dear Nikolay Izhikov > Are you going to update the Ignite-Spark integration for Spark 2.4. But the > compatibility with Spark 2.3 will be broken, isn't it? Do you have any > plans to support the different version of Spark without loosing your unique > expertise in Spark-Ignite integration? > > чт, 15 авг. 2019 г. в 14:54, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>: > > > Hello, Igniters. > > > > I try to upgrade Spark version but failed. > > > > Seems, internal Spark API(External Catalog, SQL planner) that we use > > changed a lot. > > So it will take some time to upgrade version. > > > > For now, I work hard to complete the second phase of IEP-35 so I postpone > > upgrade Spark version to Ignite 2.8. > > > > В Чт, 15/08/2019 в 14:51 +0300, Dmitriy Pavlov пишет: > > > Hi Denis, > > > > > > Sure, since code freeze is planned for today, I don't mind to include > > > > this > > > bug. > > > > > > Ivan, could you complete this issue by 20 August? > > > > > > BTW #1, Dmitriy Govoruchnin, please reply about commit for > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11953?src=confmacro > > > > > > BTW #2, FYI, release page is now available here > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.7.6 > > > > > > BTW #3, FYI, release related test PR is here > > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/6775 and it's TC Bot report is > > > > here: > > > > > > > https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=ignite-2.7.6&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.7.6 > > > > > > > > > чт, 15 авг. 2019 г. в 13:55, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > An Ignite user just reported a silly issue that needs to be fixed in > > > > 2.7.6: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12068 > > > > > > > > More details and context: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57479636/simple-select-query-missing-rows-in-ignite > > > > > > > > Ivan, please help us to make it to the release. > > > > > > > > - > > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:47 AM Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > IGNITE-12507 (Persistence files are stored to temp dir) has > > > > definitely be > > > > > added the scope and treated one of the main release drivers. > > > > > > > > > > Dmitry, please let us know once the release wiki page is ready so > > > > that we > > > > > can finalize the timelines based on chosen scope. > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 7:12 PM Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks to everyone, who participated in the discussion. > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to wait also fix for > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12057 > > > > > > > > > > > > and discussion results for that issue: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/498a14b3971950a45ef57f45cc23d2438ce1afba000b586e230927bf@%3Cdev.ignite.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since some issues are still open, we'll probably move some dates > > > > > > > > forward, > > > > > > but it seems we managed to discuss scope before scope freeze. > > > > > > > > > > > > I consider now the scope is frozen - no new feature can be added > > > > to the > > > > > > scope of 2.7.6. We're entering the rampdown phase. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov > > > > > > > > > > > > See > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Release+Process > > > > > > for > > > > > > more details. > > > > > > > > > > > > пн, 12 авг. 2019 г. в 16:37, Zhenya Stanilovsky > > > > > > <arzamas...@mail.ru.invalid > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > Hi al,, i also suggest to append [1], cause it could produce > > > > > > > CorruptedTreeException in some scenario. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12061 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Can we include > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12060 ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is > > > > > > > > a https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11953 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 10:04 AM Nikolay Izhikov < > > > > > > > > nizhi...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, Deni. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nickolay, could you check if that's a quick upgrade? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I will take a look. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > В Чт, 08/08/2019 в 11:08 -0700, Denis Magda пишет: > > > > > > > > > > Dmitry, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please add this BTree corruption fix to the scope: > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11953 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Plus, I would upgrade our Spark integration to version 2.4 > > > > as > > > > > > > > long > > > > > > as > > > > > > > 2.3 > > > > > > > > > > goes with limitations reported by our users: > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12054 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nickolay, could you check if that's a quick upgrade? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 10:40 AM Dmitriy Pavlov < > > > > > > > > > > > > dpav...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ivan, Ilya, Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like this release would be as minimal as > > > > possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > According to dates proposed we could freeze scope at > > > > 12.08, 4 > > > > > > > > > > > > days > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > more > > > > > > > > > > > than enough to stand up and say, ‘Hey, I have an urgent > > > > fix’. > > > > > > > > But > > > > > > > it is > > > > > > > > > > > also ok for me if we decide to have more relaxed dates. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For now, I suppose the following fixed should be > > > > cherry-picked: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11767 > > > > (Blocker) > > > > > > > > > > > GridDhtPartitionsFullMessage retains huge maps on heap in > > > > > > > > > > > > exchange > > > > > > > > > history > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10451 > > > > (Major > > > > > > > > Bug) > > > > > > > .NET: > > > > > > > > > > > Persistence does not work with custom affinity function > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9562 > > > > (Critical > > > > > > > > > > > > Bug) > > > > > > > > > Destroyed > > > > > > > > > > > cache that resurrected on an old offline node breaks PME > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But I will continue to research JIRA. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > чт, 8 авг. 2019 г. в 17:30, Павлухин Иван < > > > > > > > > vololo...@gmail.com > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What's the scope for this release? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Same question. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the other hand an idea of 2.7.6 release attracts me > > > > > > > > because > > > > > > > having > > > > > > > > > > > > a practice of doing frequent minor releases can help > > > > us to > > > > > > > > > > > > build > > > > > > > > > > > > reliable and predictable release rails. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > чт, 8 авг. 2019 г. в 15:09, Ilya Kasnacheev < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What's the scope for this release? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > чт, 8 авг. 2019 г. в 15:07, Dmitriy Pavlov < > > > > > > > > > > > > dpav...@apache.org > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Apache Ignite Developers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We seem to be on the same page about 2.8 release, > > > > but > > > > > > > > we’ve > > > > > > > > > started > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > new > > > > > > > > > > > > > > practice - minor releases, the first release was > > > > 2.7.5. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there is a couple of issues still not fixed in that > > > > > > > > > > > > release, > > > > > > > so I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would > > > > > > > > > > > > > > like to propose to prepare one more minor release > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > Apache > > > > > > > > > Ignite. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I propose my candidacy to be release manager once > > > > again. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I could (of course with help from Peter Ivanov) do > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > additional > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > efforts > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to complete and improve process doc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Release+Process > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I propose (most optimistic) dates for release > > > > stages: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Scope Freeze: August 12, 2019 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Code Freeze: August 15, 2019 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Voting Date: August 22, 2019 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Release Date: August 27, 2019 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If nobody minds, I will create branch 2.7.6 based > > > > on > > > > > > > > 2.7.5 > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > set up > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the TC Bot during the weekend. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Ivan Pavlukhin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Zhenya Stanilovsky > > > > > > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
