Ok, I'll clarify the situation

1. Currently, the ML module is like a black box for me. What exactly
we are expected to get by the code freeze date? Do we have tickets we
should address to?

- Yes, we have a few epics that are not finished yet, due to limited free
time the planned dates were written earlier

2. I think we can move code freeze date to December 11-th but, from
your side, do you think that 2-weeks of stabilization and regression
will be enough for the master branch living without release for a
year?

Ok, I've ready to move code freeze to your dates but not to 1 November, it
sounds weird (why we should go so fast if haven't released during the year)
I'm against fast releasing without planned dates.

3. What do you think about that we will make the huge 2.8 release in
November with long period of branch stabilization and an additional
2.8.1 release with ML component in January? Such an approach have some
advantages like we will not rush the development of ML components.

The best idea here is ability to merge the last ML changes during
stabilization period (bug fixing, tests and so on), is it ok for you?

2.8.1 could be a good point, but remind you guys, the normal practice to
plan release for 2 months and ask another maintainers about another modules
maybe the need additional clarification from another committers.

пн, 23 сент. 2019 г. в 13:35, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:

> +1 to start releasing 2.8 in November or even in the end of October.
>
> Alex, can we schedule some quick meetings in the new Ignite Slack chat and
> discuss all release date details?
> Wendseday, 25 September is good for you?
>
>
> В Пн, 23/09/2019 в 13:31 +0300, Maxim Muzafarov пишет:
> > Alexey,
> >
> > Can you, please, clarify some questions.
> >
> > 1. Currently, the ML module is like a black box for me. What exactly
> > we are expected to get by the code freeze date? Do we have tickets we
> > should address to?
> >
> > 2. I think we can move code freeze date to December 11-th but, from
> > your side, do you think that 2-weeks of stabilization and regression
> > will be enough for the master branch living without release for a
> > year?
> >
> > 3. What do you think about that we will make the huge 2.8 release in
> > November with long period of branch stabilization and an additional
> > 2.8.1 release with ML component in January? Such an approach have some
> > advantages like we will not rush the development of ML components.
> >
> > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 17:24, Alexey Zinoviev <zaleslaw....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > I wrote about code freeze at  December 18, 2019, ok, we can move one
> week
> > > earlier to 11 December
> > > Voting + Release could be after 10th January.
> > >
> > > пт, 20 сент. 2019 г. в 15:43, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > Alexey,
> > > >
> > > > It is not a problem to shift release a bit later or earlier, but I'm
> > > > strictly against having `code freeze` stage on holidays (the
> Christmas
> > > > holidays at the end of December and New Year holidays at the
> beginning
> > > > of January). From my point, it's better to have it completed `code
> > > > freeze` stage before December 23th or started after 10th January.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:09, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 For Maxim as release manager.
> > > > >
> > > > > Maxim,
> > > > >
> > > > > It is a good thing that you have committer rights, and most of the
> steps
> > > > > you will be able to complete yourself.
> > > > >
> > > > > But please engage one from PMC member to complete steps from the
> release
> > > > > process where PMC rights are required
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Release+Process
> At
> > > > > least, access to docker and nuget creds requires PMC membership.
> > > > >
> > > > > Feel free to ping me, I will assist, as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sincerely,
> > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > пт, 20 сент. 2019 г. в 14:59, Alexey Zinoviev <
> zaleslaw....@gmail.com>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > For Spark and ML components the best dates should be moved to
> one month
> > > > > > later, what's about?
> > > > > > There are a lot of features there, but a lot of bugs and minor
> > > > > > improvements in JIRA too
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Also I support you as a release manager
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Scope Freeze: December 4, 2019
> > > > > > Code Freeze: December 18, 2019
> > > > > > Voting Date: January 10, 2019
> > > > > > Release Date: January 17, 2019
> > > > > >
> > > > > > пт, 20 сент. 2019 г. в 14:44, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org
> >:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Igniters,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It's almost a year has passed since the last major Apache
> Ignite 2.7
> > > > > > > has been released. We've accumulated a lot of performance
> > > >
> > > > improvements
> > > > > > > and a lot of new features which are waiting for their release
> date.
> > > > > > > Here is my list of the most interesting things from my point
> since
> > > >
> > > > the
> > > > > > > last major release:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Service Grid,
> > > > > > > Monitoring,
> > > > > > > Recovery Read
> > > > > > > BLT auto-adjust,
> > > > > > > PDS compression,
> > > > > > > WAL page compression,
> > > > > > > Thin client: best effort affinity,
> > > > > > > Thin client: transactions support (not yet)
> > > > > > > SQL query history
> > > > > > > SQL statistics
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think we should no longer wait and freeze the master branch
> anymore
> > > > > > > and prepare the next major release by the end of the year.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I propose to discuss Time, Scope of Apache Ignite 2.8 release
> and
> > > >
> > > > also
> > > > > > > I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the
> planning
> > > > > > > release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Scope Freeze: November 4, 2019
> > > > > > > Code Freeze: November 18, 2019
> > > > > > > Voting Date: December 10, 2019
> > > > > > > Release Date: December 17, 2019
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > WDYT?
> > > > > > >
>

Reply via email to