Hi, Igniters!

I have implemented the master key change process [1] for TDE as
described in the design [2].

I have prepared PR [3] and created the Upsource review branch [4].

Could anyone take a look at my changes?

Can we include it into a 2.8 release scope?

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12186
[2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=95652381
[3] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/6937
[4] https://reviews.ignite.apache.org/ignite/review/IGNT-CR-1067

пн, 23 сент. 2019 г. в 17:13, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
>
> Hello, Nikita.
>
> > A node creates the ChangeMasterKeyMessage message and sent it by discovery 
> > as a custom event.
> > The goal is to verify that all nodes have the same master key.
> ...
> > The ChangeMasterKeyFinishMessage action message is sent by discovery as a 
> > custom event.
> > New master key id.
>
> 1. We should store locally new key id and new key hash after processing of 
> ChangeMasterKeyMessage
> 2. We should send new key hash in ChangeMasterKeyFinishMessage
> 3. We should ensure that both ChangeMasterKeyMessage and 
> ChangeMasterKeyFinishMessage contains the same key id and key hash before 
> executing a change process.
>
> I think we should rename:
>
> > Node left during key rotation process(was not starting re-encrypt cache 
> > keys)
>
> Node was down during key rotation. ChangeMasterKeyRecord was not found.
>
> > Node left during key rotation process(was starting re-encrypt cache keys)
>
> Node was down during key rotation. ChangeMasterKeyRecord found.
>
> We should add a description of changes in the cluster join process.
> A node should not try to join to the cluster before the process of 
> ChangeMasterKeyRecord.
>
> It's not clear for me how we differ two cases:
>
> 1. ChangeMasterKeyRecord found in WAL and key rotation was finished 
> successfully.
> 2. ChangeMasterKeyRecord found in WAL and key rotation was NOT finished 
> successfully.
>
> > Meta storage will store master key id.
>
> We should add that key id from metastorage has a higher priority to key id 
> from IgniteConfiguration.
>
>
> В Пт, 20/09/2019 в 14:06 +0300, Nikita Amelchev пишет:
> > Nikolay,
> >
> > you are right in many ways. I updated the design on the wiki. [1]
> >
> > [1] 
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=95652381
> >
> > пт, 20 сент. 2019 г. в 13:49, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > Nikita
> > >
> > > > I suggested the implementation where the encryption manager is
> > > > responsible for storing the master key id.
> > >
> > > I don't think it's a right proposal.
> > >
> > > 1. EncryptionSpi implementation becomes more complicated. Developer of it 
> > > should be aware of Ignite deployment scenarious, etc.
> > > Imagine implementation when EncryptionSpi send master key id to some 
> > > external storage over network(it's happen in Discovery thread)
> > >
> > > 2. Implementation would be duplicate features(saving master key id)
> > >
> > > 3. We already store cache keys in metastore. For me it's a native 
> > > approach to store master key id in the same place.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > >
> > > В Пт, 20/09/2019 в 13:39 +0300, Nikita Amelchev пишет:
> > > > Nikolay,
> > > >
> > > > because I suggested the implementation where the encryption manager is
> > > > responsible for storing the master key id.
> > > > To implement this logic in the EncryptionSpi, we will need to
> > > > introduce the methods look like this:
> > > >
> > > > setMasterKeyId(String masterKeyId) // Sets "current" master key id
> > > > String getMasterKeyId() // Gets "current" master key id
> > > >
> > > > Follow methods will work with master key that setted by previous method:
> > > >
> > > > byte[] masterKeyDigest()
> > > > byte[] encryptKey(Serializable key)
> > > > Serializable decryptKey(byte[] key)
> > > >
> > > > If such implementation is more reasonable, I will do so.
> > > >
> > > > пт, 20 сент. 2019 г. в 13:04, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
> > > > >
> > > > > Why do we need "defaultMasterKeyId" instead of *current* master key 
> > > > > id that can be obtained with 
> > > > > `KeystoreEncryptionSpi#getMasterKeyName()`?
> > > > >
> > > > > В Пт, 20/09/2019 в 12:56 +0300, Nikita Amelchev пишет:
> > > > > > Nikolay,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for the proposal, I like it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The GridEncryptionManager will control the process of master key
> > > > > > rotation, so we should provide him master key id at startup. Seems 
> > > > > > we
> > > > > > should get it from some configuration for encryption.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I suggest just adding the String defaultMasterKeyId() method into 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > EncryptionSpi interface. This method gets default master key id used
> > > > > > on first cluster start.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The specific implementation will be responsible for setting this 
> > > > > > value.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What do you think?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > пт, 20 сент. 2019 г. в 10:44, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello, Nikita
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > IgniteConfiguration: New methods will be added to the 
> > > > > > > > IgniteConfiguration:
> > > > > > > > public IgniteConfiguration setEncryptionMasterKeyId(String 
> > > > > > > > masterKeyId) - sets master key id.
> > > > > > > > public String getEncryptionMasterKeyId()
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We don't need it in the IgniteConfiguration.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As you may know, we already have 
> > > > > > > KeystoreEncryptionSpi#setMasterKeyName.
> > > > > > > Seems, we should add it to the EncryptionSpi itself.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > В Ср, 18/09/2019 в 22:25 +0300, Nikita Amelchev пишет:
> > > > > > > > Nikolay, thanks for participating.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have supplemented the design and clarify these moments. [1]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1] 
> > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=95652381
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ср, 18 сент. 2019 г. в 16:48, Nikolay Izhikov 
> > > > > > > > <nizhi...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hello, Nikita.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks for starting this discussion.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 1. We should add prerequisites for "master key rotation 
> > > > > > > > > process" in design.
> > > > > > > > > Seems, it should be, "New master key available to 
> > > > > > > > > EncryptionSPI for each server node".
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2. Please, use code formatting in wiki. It's make reading 
> > > > > > > > > easier.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 3. Please, clarify java API proposal. What will be changed 
> > > > > > > > > and how.
> > > > > > > > > AFAIK we need to change EncryptionSPI, this should be covered 
> > > > > > > > > in design.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 4. Please, clarify new CLI commands.
> > > > > > > > > AFAIK we should have 2 command:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >         1. Start regular master key rotation process.
> > > > > > > > >         2. Start local master key rotation process during 
> > > > > > > > > node recovery(for the case when key changed while node was 
> > > > > > > > > down).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > В Ср, 18/09/2019 в 16:09 +0300, Nikita Amelchev пишет:
> > > > > > > > > > Hi, Igniters.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'm going to implement the ability to rotate the master 
> > > > > > > > > > encryption key
> > > > > > > > > > (TDE Phase 2). [1]
> > > > > > > > > > Master key rotation required in case of it compromising or 
> > > > > > > > > > at the end
> > > > > > > > > > of crypto period(key validity period). I prepared the 
> > > > > > > > > > design. [2]
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > In briefly, master keys will be identified by String 
> > > > > > > > > > masterKeyId. The
> > > > > > > > > > concept of the masterKeyId will be added to the cache keys 
> > > > > > > > > > encryption
> > > > > > > > > > process in EncryptionSpi.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Users can configure master key id in IgniteConfiguration 
> > > > > > > > > > and will be
> > > > > > > > > > able to manage the key rotation process from java API, JMX, 
> > > > > > > > > > CLI:
> > > > > > > > > >  - ignite.encryption().changeMasterKey(String masterKeyId) 
> > > > > > > > > > - starts
> > > > > > > > > > master key rotation process.
> > > > > > > > > >  - String ignite.encryption().getMasterKeyId() - gets 
> > > > > > > > > > current master key id.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12186
> > > > > > > > > > [2] 
> > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=95652381
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >



-- 
Best wishes,
Amelchev Nikita

Reply via email to