-1 Prohibit On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:41 PM Zhenya Stanilovsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> > -1, sounds confusing, i wan`t use deprecated API > and @IgniteExperimental it`s something unknown with undefined «time for > support». > > > > >Dear Apache Ignite community, > > > >We would like to conduct a formal vote on the subject of whether to allow > >or prohibit a joint existence of @deprecated annotation for an old API > >and @IgniteExperimental [1] for a new (replacement) API. The result of > this > >vote will be formalized as an Apache Ignite development rule to be used in > >future. > > > >The discussion thread where you can address all non-vote messages is [2]. > > > >The votes are: > >*[+1 Allow]* Allow to deprecate the old APIs even when new APIs are marked > >with @IgniteExperimental to explicitly notify users that an old APIs will > >be removed in the next major release AND new APIs are available. > >*[-1 Prohibit]* Never deprecate the old APIs unless the new APIs are > stable > >and released without @IgniteExperimental. The old APIs javadoc may be > >updated with a reference to new APIs to encourage users to evaluate new > >APIs. The deprecation and new API release may happen simultaneously if the > >new API is not marked with @IgniteExperimental or the annotation is > removed > >in the same release. > > > >Neither of the choices prohibits deprecation of an API without a > >replacement if community decides so. > > > >The vote will hold for 72 hours and will end on February 13th 2020 08:00 > >UTC: > > > https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?year=2020&month=2&day=13&hour=8&min=0&sec=0&p0=utc-1 > > > >All votes count, there is no binding/non-binding status for this. > > > >[1] > > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/master/modules/core/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/lang/IgniteExperimental.java > >[2] > > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Public-API-deprecation-rules-td45647.html > > > >Thanks, > >--AG > > > > > >
