Fixed your comments! Stepan, please rebuild the release and test!

чт, 13 февр. 2020 г. в 17:22, Alexey Zinoviev <zaleslaw....@gmail.com>:

> Should I wait any ML-related issues in examples?
> I could wait a day or two if you are going to continue your testing deals
> with ML and examples to push changes together.
>
> Are you running your examples on the release staging as a ignite
> dependency, isn't it?
>
>
> чт, 13 февр. 2020 г. в 14:37, Stepan Pilschikov <pilshchikov....@gmail.com
> >:
>
>> filled ticket - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12673
>>
>> чт, 13 февр. 2020 г. в 13:46, Alexey Zinoviev <zaleslaw....@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> I suppose one ticket is enough, collect where all your nites and thoughts
>>>
>>> чт, 13 февр. 2020 г., 12:12 Stepan Pilschikov <pilshchikov....@gmail.com
>>> >:
>>>
>>>> And one (three) more thing
>>>>
>>>> In TutorialStepByStepExample we running 17 examples
>>>> First 12 logging is pretty good and looks like "Tutorial step N: name"
>>>> -> model -> accuracy -> "Tutorial step N: completed"
>>>> But then starting with 13 this pattern is kind of broke, step start and
>>>> step completion is missing
>>>>
>>>> Also want to admin that
>>>> Step_8_CV_with_Param_Grid_and_metrics_and_pipeline is haven't step
>>>> completion log
>>>> And complete log for Step_9_Scaling_With_Stacking looks like 'Tutorial
>>>> step 5 (scaling) example completed'
>>>>
>>>> i don't know, should i made some ticket? One ticket for each problem or
>>>> one for all or you can fix it in one commit? because fixes quite small
>>>>
>>>> ср, 12 февр. 2020 г. в 16:31, Alexey Zinoviev <zaleslaw....@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, you are right. Missed resources, I'll remove them tomorrow
>>>>>
>>>>> ср, 12 февр. 2020 г. в 16:23, Stepan Pilschikov <
>>>>> pilshchikov....@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> With mnist_tf_model in same directory
>>>>>> All others looks right
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ср, 12 февр. 2020 г. в 16:21, Stepan Pilschikov <
>>>>>> pilshchikov....@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hmm, interesting, got it
>>>>>>> Also found
>>>>>>> apache-ignite-2.8.0-bin/examples/src/main/resources/models/mleap
>>>>>>> I think its also should be removed then
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ср, 12 февр. 2020 г. в 16:11, Alexey Zinoviev <
>>>>>>> zaleslaw....@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please, have a look to the next ticket
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12659
>>>>>>>> Also tensorflow packages are blockers for IGFS deprecation and
>>>>>>>> removal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ср, 12 февр. 2020 г. в 15:58, Alexey Zinoviev <
>>>>>>>> zaleslaw....@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They are not lost, they are removed from release branch due to a
>>>>>>>>> lot of bugs, cves and so on, don't worry about that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ср, 12 февр. 2020 г., 14:31 Stepan Pilschikov <
>>>>>>>>> pilshchikov....@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Also lost ignite-ml-tensorflow-model-parser and ignite-tensorflow
>>>>>>>>>> in libs/optional
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ср, 12 февр. 2020 г. в 14:25, Stepan Pilschikov <
>>>>>>>>>> pilshchikov....@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But now have new problems
>>>>>>>>>>> I build ignite-2.8 build on TC
>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/buildConfiguration/Releases_ApacheIgniteMain_ReleaseBuild/5043672
>>>>>>>>>>> Previous
>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/buildConfiguration/Releases_ApacheIgniteMain_ReleaseBuild/4988324
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> New build much lighter
>>>>>>>>>>> Previous: 5.7 Gb
>>>>>>>>>>> Current: 4.3 Gb
>>>>>>>>>>> And its looks like something missing, on a first look i notice
>>>>>>>>>>> that /libs/optional/ignite-ml-mleap-model-parser lost completely
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 12 февр. 2020 г. в 14:18, Stepan Pilschikov <
>>>>>>>>>>> pilshchikov....@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for fix
>>>>>>>>>>>> Duplicated examples deleted and tutorial works on real (1+
>>>>>>>>>>>> node) cluster now
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think ticket can be closed, have no power here
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 11 февр. 2020 г. в 20:44, Alexey Zinoviev <
>>>>>>>>>>>> zaleslaw....@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, for that, but I it touches ML-related stuff only and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't influence on any another module.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I merged them to master later (currently, I have a 4 tickets
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in a queue).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will keep in mind for the next fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 11 февр. 2020 г. в 18:58, Maxim Muzafarov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is the approach when we cherry-pick fixes to the 2.8 only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixes have verified in the master branch better? I just want
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure the release branch to be stable enough.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 18:36, Alexey Zinoviev <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> zaleslaw....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Fixed both in release branch 2.8. Please verify and let me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > вт, 11 февр. 2020 г. в 14:58, Stepan Pilschikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pilshchikov....@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > And one more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12658 -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > TutorialStepByStepExample example failed if cluster with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more then 1 node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > вт, 11 февр. 2020 г. в 11:52, Alexey Zinoviev <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> zaleslaw....@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> Great, thank you so much, will fix next week
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> вт, 11 февр. 2020 г., 11:39 Stepan Pilschikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pilshchikov....@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> Hi, Alexey, could you please looking on one small
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accident happen in ML
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> examples:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12657 - 2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples exactly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> the same.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> Also want to say that all previous examples have one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> common approach for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> meaningful output, like ">>> Something important". In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this two i seeing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> different one, could you please also pay attention to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> Stepan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Reply via email to