Ivan,

I agree with you that the more members will check the release the
better will be. That's why I've shared the release candidate links [1]
before starting a vote. The best time for starting a vote is not
mentioned at our release wiki page [2] (should we?) and I've also
failed with googling the best practices for it too. So, I've supposed
since all of us are working on their own tasks during weekdays the
free time on the weekend is the best choice for cheking\voting on the
release. Probably this decision was wrong.

[1] 
http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Ignite-2-8-RELEASE-Time-Scope-Manager-tp43616p46117.html
[2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Release+Process

On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 at 00:37, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Also I have a comment regarding to voting. Voting for 72 hour spanning
> a weekend sounds a little bit odd to me. In a particular case the more
> people check the release the better. And I suppose there is more time
> for it on weekdays for the majority.
>
> Best regards,
> Ivan Pavlukhin
>
> вс, 1 мар. 2020 г. в 00:33, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > As I remember, that Pavlov suggested to discuss threats on a private PMC 
> > > list
> > Cannot understand why it should be discussed on a private list. What
> > is the clue?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Ivan Pavlukhin
> >
> > сб, 29 февр. 2020 г. в 16:00, Alexey Zinoviev <zaleslaw....@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > As I remember, that Pavlov suggested to discuss threats on a private PMC
> > > list
> > >
> > > сб, 29 февр. 2020 г., 15:12 Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > Hello!
> > > >
> > > > As far as my understanding goes, ignite-zookeeper is listed for removal
> > > > because it brings a lot of dependencies, some of which may have known
> > > > vulnerabilities, which will make the distribution also considered
> > > > vulnerable by some scanners.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > --
> > > > Ilya Kasnacheev
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > сб, 29 февр. 2020 г. в 14:18, Alexey Zinoviev <zaleslaw....@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > Ok, lets move to this thread. Also, the slim release could be form by
> > > > > voting on user-list
> > > > >
> > > > > сб, 29 февр. 2020 г., 9:55 Alexey Goncharuk 
> > > > > <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com
> > > > >:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Nikolay, Alexey,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > First, the idea of the slim binary release and docker image was
> > > > discussed
> > > > > > openly on the dev-list [1]. Second, nobody talks about removing 
> > > > > > these
> > > > > > modules from the product. The idea was to create an additional
> > > > > distribution
> > > > > > which is much lighter than the current full package to reduce the 
> > > > > > size
> > > > of
> > > > > > the downloadable artifact and reduce the number of potential
> > > > > > vulnerabilities in third-party libraries.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The list of modules was chosen subjectively by the number of 
> > > > > > questions
> > > > on
> > > > > > the user-list, number third-party libraries (size) and 
> > > > > > vulnerabilities
> > > > > the
> > > > > > module brings. Given that there are still questions, we are 
> > > > > > definitely
> > > > > not
> > > > > > ready to release it in 2.8.0.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Let's move discussion to the original thread?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Slim-binary-release-and-docker-image-for-Apache-Ignite-td45110.html
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >

Reply via email to