Hello! Why not the Failure Handler then?
(I'm only half-joking). Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev ср, 12 авг. 2020 г. в 09:54, Oleg Ostanin <[email protected]>: > Thank you for the response. Yes, we have a simple warning in log, but in > case SSL error needs an immediate human attention it would be better to set > a listener for such events. > > вт, 11 авг. 2020 г. в 17:59, Ilya Kasnacheev <[email protected]>: > > > Hello! > > > > I'm not sure this is a good event. Events are computer-processable, while > > SSL error either needs attention from a human or none at all. > > > > Then again, sometimes it's not an SSL error (come to think or it, > > unauthorized people tend to not use SSL since success is not an option > > here) but any unexpected input. Such input will mean that something (or > > somebody) wrong is trying to connect, possibly using a wrong port or > hoping > > that SSL is disabled. > > > > Maybe we need a simple warning. I guess we already have it, actually. > Don't > > we? > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > > > > вт, 11 авг. 2020 г. в 14:27, Oleg Ostanin <[email protected]>: > > > > > Hello igniters! I wonder if we can add a new event for a failed ssl > > > connection? Considering security hazards it can be quite helpful to get > > > notifications in case someone unauthorized is trying to connect to the > > > cluster. I've created a small pull-request to illustrate a possible > > > solution. > > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8139 > > > Please tell me what do you think. > > > > > >
