Hi Alex,
Yes, we can start releasing the extensions modules. I would like to also help in releasing a few extensions, it will also help me to be familiarized with the release process. Mikhail and I have been having discussion about whether we should use provided scope for dependencies or shall we use 2.9.0 for ignite.version for the extensions modules? Jira : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13621 PR : https://github.com/apache/ignite-extensions/pull/28/files Please let us know your thoughts. Denis, We have the following jira ticket for documentation work for ignite extensions releases. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12951 Please let us know if the scope in the issue looks good. Regards, Saikat On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:28 AM Denis Magda <[email protected]> wrote: > Alex, > > Should we create a dedicated ticket for the documentation changes or can we > reuse IGNITE-13634? As a bare minimum, we need to update maven artifacts' > names and versions: > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/docs/_docs/extensions-and-integrations > > > > - > Denis > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 5:10 AM Alexey Goncharuk < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > > Igniters, > > > > Since Ignite 2.9 has been released, I think we can now release the > > extension modules related to streaming. > > > > I noticed that unlike spring autoconfigure, the streamer extensions > > dependencies do not have provided scope, so I created a ticket to fix > that > > [1]. Anything else we should fix before releasing the extensions? > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13634 > > > > --AG > > >
