Nikita, What's wrong with platform-specific thin-client articles? These articles describe how to configure and use specific thin client implementation, why should we remove them?
чт, 1 июл. 2021 г. в 16:06, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>: > Binary prorocol description should stand and improved (there are some > mistakes in this article) > > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 16:05 Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>: > > > https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ > > > > AFAIK, thin clients have been already removed since 2.10 > > > > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 15:57 Nikita Safonov <vlasovpavel2...@gmail.com>: > > > >> Hi guys! > >> > >> Sorry, totally missed this email. > >> > >> I can do this right away. > >> > >> Just a couple of questions first: > >> > >> [1] On the website, under the Thin Clients tab, we have the following > >> articles: > >> > >> Thin Clients > >> Thin Clients Overview > >> Java Thin Client > >> .NET Thin Client > >> C++ Thin Client > >> Python Thin Client > >> PHP Thin Client > >> Node.js Thin Client > >> Binary Client Protocol > >> > >> I do believe that the introduction ( "Thin Clients" - the first one) > >> should > >> remain, while we can remove the rest (by the way, what about Binary > Client > >> Protocol? Should it remain too?). > >> What do you think about this? > >> > >> [2] Could you please indicate the place in the docs where the link to > the > >> actual readthedocs.io documentation is? I didn't manage to find it. > >> If we don't have it, I would place it at the beginning of the Thin > >> clients' > >> introduction article. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Nikita > >> > >> > >> ср, 30 июн. 2021 г. в 09:36, Alexey Gidaspov <olive.c...@gmail.com>: > >> > >> > Hi, Nikita! > >> > > >> > Your help with documentation is really needed. Can you describe how we > >> can > >> > start with it? > >> > > >> > On 2021/06/09 10:06:09, Nikita Safonov <vlasovpavel2...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > Hello Igniters! > >> > > > >> > > I guess that AI 2.11 will include documentation work. > >> > > I'll be glad to help with this. > >> > > And I'll be happy to know the scope of features that we need to > >> document. > >> > > > >> > > Regards, > >> > > Nikita > >> > > > >> > > пт, 4 июн. 2021 г. в 03:50, 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com>: > >> > > > >> > > > hello, > >> > > > > >> > > > can someone can help to merge the following patch into master? > >> > > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12852 > >> > > > > >> > > > This patch has been completed for a long time, and I think it is a > >> > > > valuable one. > >> > > > > >> > > > 在 2021/6/3 下午11:12, Dmitry Pavlov 写道: > >> > > > > Sure, thanks for your reply > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA account > >> integration > >> > for > >> > > > non-committers? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > For the page > >> > > > > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11 > >> > > > > I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to be not > >> sufficient. > >> > Can > >> > > > wiki admins set up smth? Or Alexey should do some setup on his > own? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On 2021/06/03 14:55:25, Maksim Timonin <timonin.ma...@gmail.com > > > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad to hear > >> there > >> > are > >> > > > >> chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone it. > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov < > dpav...@apache.org > >> > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >>> ok, Maksim, keep us posted. > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a > >> chance )) > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin < > timonin.ma...@gmail.com > >> > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > >>>>> Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. > I > >> > guess > >> > > > if > >> > > > >>> it > >> > > > >>>> is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time. > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>> Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review. I'm OK to release > >> it > >> > > > within > >> > > > >>> the > >> > > > >>>> next release. > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov < > >> dpav...@apache.org> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>>> Hi Alexey, > >> > > > >>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> Releasing master as-is makes sence for me. > >> > > > >>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. > I > >> > guess > >> > > > if > >> > > > >>> it > >> > > > >>>>> is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time. > >> > > > >>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a > big > >> > deal, > >> > > > but > >> > > > >>>>> still makes sense to start discussion, create and share wiki > >> > page and > >> > > > >>>>> create branch. > >> > > > >>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> Since committer privileges required to create branch, could > >> you > >> > > > please > >> > > > >>>>> notify me in advance. > >> > > > >>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> Sincerely, > >> > > > >>>>> Dmitriy Pavlov > >> > > > >>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> On 2021/06/03 14:08:34, �������������� ���������������� < > >> > > > >>>>> olive.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>> :scope: > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>> Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i picked for Apache > Ignite > >> > 2.11 > >> > > > >>>>> release > >> > > > >>>>>> Let's start discussion > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>> [1] > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20%20AND%20status%20%20%3D%20Resolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC > >> > > > >>>>>> On 2021/05/13 14:27:33, Dmitry Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>>> Hi Alexey, > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> :pmc to sign distribution: > >> > > > >>>>>>> Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so > part > >> of > >> > > > >>>>> activities should be picked up by committer and PMC member. > If > >> > noone > >> > > > >>> else > >> > > > >>>>> want to help you here, I would. > >> > > > >>>>>>> :timeline: > >> > > > >>>>>>> And, could you estimate all phases of the release. > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> :scope: > >> > > > >>>>>>> I guess we can just pick up master current state and > release > >> > it. > >> > > > >>> But > >> > > > >>>>> if someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular > >> > feature to > >> > > > >>> be > >> > > > >>>>> completed before branch divergence/release candidate build, > >> > please > >> > > > let > >> > > > >>> know. > >> > > > >>>>>>> Sincerely, > >> > > > >>>>>>> Dmitriy Pavlov > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов < > >> olive.c...@gmail.com > >> > > > >> > > > >>>>> wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>>>> Dear Ignite Community! > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. > >> Also > >> > > > >>>>> suggest > >> > > > >>>>>>>> myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan > >> > release > >> > > > >>> at > >> > > > >>>>> the end > >> > > > >>>>>>>> of june 2021. > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> ___ > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >> > > > >>>>>>>> Alexey Gidaspov > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
