Ivan,

And what if I have already committed transaction? Is it safe rollback
already committed transaction? Rollback will silently return and do
nothing? - yes, it is stated in the javadoc in the PR.

Andrey,

Then using "runInTransaction", lack of commit will cause a transaction to
rollback automatically.

There is no need for a "close" method, it just adds confusion.


ср, 14 июл. 2021 г. в 11:37, Andrey Mashenkov <andrey.mashen...@gmail.com>:

> Agree with Ivan.
>
> Method runInTransaction() should try to finish the transaction if the user
> forgot to commit one.
> I guess it might be a common mistake among new users.
>
> Also, I suggest to extent all table projections for better UX.
> Let's allow
>     table.kvView().withTx(tx)
> to user may cache kvVew instance and do
>     kvView.withTx(tx)
> rather than
>     table.withTx(tx).kvVew()
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 10:13 AM Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Alexey, and is there any analogue to close() of transaction? When you
> start
> > transaction, you should somehow to close it, if you don't catch exception
> > or forget to commit.
> >
> > I suggest to add method closeAsync() to Transaction, so user can call it
> in
> > handle or whenComplete, i.e.
> >
> > So code will looks like
> >
> > CacheApi cache = CacheApi.getCache("testCache");
> >
> > Transactions
> >     .beginTransaction()
> >     .thenCompose(tx -> {
> >         CacheApi txCache = cache.withTx(tx);
> >         CompletableFuture<Void> result = txCache.getAsync("key")
> >             .thenCompose(val -> {
> >                 if (val == "test") {
> >                     return txCache.putAsync("key", "test1");
> >                 }
> >                 else
> >                     return CompletableFuture.completedFuture(null);
> >             })
> >             .thenCompose(v -> tx.commitAsync())
> >             .handle((v, ex) -> null);
> >         return result.thenCompose(v -> tx.closeAsync());
> >     });
> >
> > I also suggests to add method something like this
> >
> > static CompletableFuture<Void> inTxAsync(Function<Transaction,
> > CompletableFuture<Void>> action) {
> >     return Transactions
> >         .beginTransaction()
> >         .thenCompose(tx -> {
> >             CompletableFuture<Object> result = action.apply(tx)
> >                 .handle((v, ex) -> null);
> >             return result.thenCompose(v -> tx.closeAsync());
> >         });
> > }
> >
> > Async api is not very readable, but this method can help user write code,
> > this is rewritten first example:
> >
> > Transactions.inTxAsync(tx -> {
> >     CacheApi txCache = cache.withTx(tx);
> >     return txCache.getAsync("key")
> >         .thenCompose(val -> {
> >             if (val == "test") {
> >                 return txCache.putAsync("key", "test1");
> >             }
> >             else
> >                 return CompletableFuture.completedFuture(null);
> >         })
> >         .thenCompose(v -> tx.commitAsync());
> > });
> >
> > ср, 14 июл. 2021 г. в 10:03, Alexei Scherbakov <
> > alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com
> > >:
> >
> > > Andrey,
> > >
> > > I suggest you look at the PR [1], if you haven't.
> > >
> > > A transaction [2]
> > > Transactions facade [3]
> > > Examples [4]
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/214/files
> > > [2]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/blob/d2122ce8c15de020e121f53509bd5a097aac9cf2/modules/api/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/tx/Transaction.java
> > > [3]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/blob/d2122ce8c15de020e121f53509bd5a097aac9cf2/modules/api/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/tx/IgniteTransactions.java
> > > [4]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/blob/d2122ce8c15de020e121f53509bd5a097aac9cf2/modules/table/src/test/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/table/TxTest.java
> > >
> > >
> > > вт, 13 июл. 2021 г. в 19:41, Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > Alexey,
> > > >
> > > > could you please describe Transaction interface?
> > > >
> > > > Also it would be great to have a couple examples of using the
> proposed
> > > API.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 4:43 PM Alexei Scherbakov
> > > > <alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Folks,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've prepared a PR implementing my vision of public transactions
> API.
> > > > >
> > > > > API is very simple and similar to Ignite 2, but has some
> differences.
> > > > >
> > > > > More details can be found here [1]
> > > > >
> > > > > Share your thoughts.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15086
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Alexei Scherbakov
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Alexei Scherbakov
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrey V. Mashenkov
>


-- 

Best regards,
Alexei Scherbakov

Reply via email to