Atri,

> Anyone with azure account should be able to test it

I checked the test included in the module with an Azure account (as I
mentioned in Jira), it passes successfully. But I'm not sure if this
is enough.

пт, 3 сент. 2021 г. в 17:48, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
>
> Atri.
>
> Right now code can’t be tested because it doesn’t compile.
>
> > 3 сент. 2021 г., в 17:42, Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org> написал(а):
> >
> > I am not sure why is it can be tested by few members?
> >
> > Anyone with azure account should be able to test it
> >
> > On Fri, 3 Sep 2021, 19:29 Maxim Muzafarov, <mmu...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Folks,
> >>
> >> The GCP and AWS should also be moved to extensions, but this is a
> >> discussion for another topic.
> >>
> >> I trust you all :-)
> >> But who can validate the patch [1]? This is a bad practice that only a
> >> few members be able to test the code.
> >>
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15388
> >>
> >> On Fri, 3 Sept 2021 at 16:43, Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> It was extensively tested by myself (running the tests on an actual Azure
> >>> account and running an Ignite cluster using an Azure account) and Ilya
> >>> (thanks Ilya!) prior to merging it in the core
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 3 Sep 2021, 18:50 Denis Magda, <dma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Disagree to exclude this contribution from the 2.11 release. As Atri
> >>>> explained, its implementation and testing approach is identical to the
> >> AWS,
> >>>> GCP and Kubernetes IP finders.
> >>>> If we want to move the modules to extensions and improve the testing
> >>>> approach, then it needs to be done for all similar components.
> >>>>
> >>>> Atri, have you tested the module in the cloud? If it works, then I
> >> don't
> >>>> see any reason why we need to have someone else double-checking this
> >> once
> >>>> again. This is the community, we need to trust each other.
> >>>>
> >>>> -
> >>>> Denis
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 9:15 AM Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I would argue that the module Co exists with the other IP discovery
> >>>> modules
> >>>>> (such as GCP and AWS), which are part of core.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In terms of tests, the azure module has exactly the same type of
> >> tests as
> >>>>> the other two modules mentioned above.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, 3 Sep 2021, 17:54 Maxim Muzafarov, <mmu...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The patch [1] for the azure module seems to be ready for review,
> >>>>>> however, there are still some questions that exist:
> >>>>>> - Do we have a technical account in azure to test the moude on TC?
> >>>>>> Manual testing for such changes is really annoying.
> >>>>>> - Is there any reason to add these changes to the main Apache
> >> Ignite
> >>>>>> project? Why not extensions?
> >>>>>> - It seems there is a lack of tests for this module.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> According to the mentions above, what do you think about moving
> >> this
> >>>>>> functionality to the next 2.12 release to solve all the questions
> >>>>>> without a rush? I propose to revert the changes related to the
> >> azure
> >>>>>> functionality from the 2.11 branch.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15388
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 20:53, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We had a separate discussion with Max and Alex, so I tend to
> >> agree
> >>>> that
> >>>>>>> both issues are blockers.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sincerely,
> >>>>>>> Dmitriy Pavlov
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> пт, 27 авг. 2021 г. в 16:41, Alexey Gidaspov <
> >> olive.c...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi, Maxim!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> These issues really block release. So we should wait fixes.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2021/08/27 12:46:24, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I've been faced these issues, which seems to be a blocker
> >> for the
> >>>>>>>>> release. Please, take a look and share your thoughts.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The server node fails when the client node with the higher
> >> java
> >>>>>>>>> version connects to it [1].
> >>>>>>>>> The Apache Ignite build fails with missing dependency [2].
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14725
> >>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15388
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 16:56, Maxim Muzafarov <
> >> mmu...@apache.org>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 16:27, Ivan Daschinsky <
> >>>>> ivanda...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I suppose, that
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15274
> >>>>>>>> is a
> >>>>>>>>>>> blocker.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Fix is quite easy and straightforward
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> пн, 2 авг. 2021 г. в 03:11, Igor Sapego <
> >> isap...@apache.org
> >>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cherry-picked to release branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 3:11 PM Alexey Gidaspov <
> >>>>>>>> olive.c...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I think we should add [1] to 2.11 release. Can
> >> you
> >>>>>>>> cherry-pick it to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> release branch?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14815
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/07/30 02:25:25, Igor Sapego <
> >> isap...@apache.org>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm fine with any of these two solutions.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 6:36 PM Ilya Kasnacheev <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it does make sense to include changes
> >> which
> >>>>> will
> >>>>>> let
> >>>>>>>> us avoid
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> migration issues in the future.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alternatively, maybe we can revert the incomplete
> >>>>> change
> >>>>>>>> from 2.11 in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> order
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to reintroduce it in 2.12 in full form if Igor
> >> agrees
> >>>>>> and RE
> >>>>>>>> thinks
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> this is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the best course of action.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 29 июл. 2021 г. в 18:07, Igor Sapego <
> >>>>>> isap...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It contains changes we could not introduce if
> >> we
> >>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>> ignite in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> its
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current state as they are going to be breaking
> >>>>> changes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 4:13 PM Alexey
> >> Gidaspov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> olive.c...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Igor!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now we are in stabilization phase and
> >> accepting
> >>>>> only
> >>>>>>>> blockers. I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> may be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong, but this ticket doesn't seem to be of
> >> that
> >>>>>> kind.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/07/28 21:00:15, Igor Sapego <
> >>>>>> isap...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest adding [1] to the scope of
> >> release,
> >>>>>> because
> >>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>> contains
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes to code introduced by [2], which is
> >>>>> already
> >>>>>>>> included in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] -
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14815
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] -
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14658
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:30 PM Maxim
> >>>> Muzafarov
> >>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The issues mentioned above were
> >> successfully
> >>>>>>>> resolved and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-picked to the ignite-2.11 branch.
> >>>> Sorry
> >>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> delay. I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can proceed with the release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 15:44, Maxim
> >>>> Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, both the fixes [1] [2] will not
> >>>> require
> >>>>>>>> performance
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rerun.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15146
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15170
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 15:30, Dmitry
> >>>> Pavlov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> dpav...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I personally trust opinion of
> >> Nikolay and
> >>>>>> Maxim,
> >>>>>>>> we can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consider
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as blockers.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just an idea to consider:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For fixed ticket/PR (
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15170)
> >>>>>>>> most
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> likely
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need to re-run performance tests.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If second issue has no impact on
> >>>>>> performance, we
> >>>>>>>> can take
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> perf
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from rc.-1 and run only functional tests
> >> for
> >>>>>> rc.0.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/07/22 04:44:01, "Николай
> >> Ижиков"
> >>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to fix both prior to release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Отправлено с iPhone
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 22 июля 2021 г., в 02:36, Maxim
> >>>>>> Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We've faced [1][2] issues
> >> related to
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>> new
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> functionality
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> added to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 2.11 release (it will be
> >> safe to
> >>>>>> merge
> >>>>>>>> to the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From my point of view, both of
> >> them
> >>>> are
> >>>>>>>> critical and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> must
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> included
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the 2.11 release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The [2] is ready for merge. The
> >> [1]
> >>>>> will
> >>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>> completed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> end
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of this week.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please share your thoughts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15146
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15170
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 15:08,
> >> Maxim
> >>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since the release branch was
> >> created
> >>>>>> some
> >>>>>>>> time ago,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bump up
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the master branch version to the
> >>>> next
> >>>>>> one?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 at 17:15,
> >> Alexey
> >>>>>>>> Gidaspov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> olive.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Pavel.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think, it looks like blocker.
> >>>>> Please
> >>>>>>>> cherry-pick
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> it to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.11
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/07/01 09:29:57, Pavel
> >>>>>> Pereslegin <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xxt...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Alexey!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible to include a
> >> hotfix
> >>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>> corrects
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> command
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> syntax
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> output in the control script?
> >> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This bug can significantly
> >>>>> complicate
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> use of
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snapshot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> function (one of the important
> >>>>>> features
> >>>>>>>> of 2.11).
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addition,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may raise a number of
> >> questions to
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> product
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> support,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent by adding this patch
> >> in
> >>>>> 2.11.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This patch does not affect any
> >>>>>> functions
> >>>>>>>> other
> >>>>>>>>>>>> than
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "help"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> output
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the control script.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14989
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 1 июл. 2021 г. в 11:56,
> >> Alexey
> >>>>>>>> Gidaspov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> olive.c...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Iilya!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As I can see, this feature
> >> highly
> >>>>>>>> improves
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> debugging
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incidents. So I think we can call it
> >> blocker
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>>>> cherry-pick
> >>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.11
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/06/30 20:26:43,
> >> Shishkov
> >>>>>> Ilya <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shishkovi...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Alexey!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible to add system
> >>>> views
> >>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> BaselineNode
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attributes [1] and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corresponding documentation
> >> [2]
> >>>> to
> >>>>>> 2.11?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15007
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15028
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 30 июн. 2021 г. в 11:07,
> >>>>> Nikita
> >>>>>>>> Amelchev <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> namelc...@apache.org>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! I have
> >> cherry-picked
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>>> commit to the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.11
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 30 июн. 2021 г. в
> >> 11:00,
> >>>>> Alexey
> >>>>>>>> Gidaspov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> olive.c...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Nikita!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it's important
> >> fix and
> >>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> included in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.11
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. I've
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tagged ticket by fixVersion
> >>>> 2.11.
> >>>>>> Can
> >>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.11
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? And please fill
> >> release
> >>>>>> notes
> >>>>>>>> or delete
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> flag.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/06/30 07:55:04,
> >> Nikita
> >>>>>>>> Amelchev <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> namelc...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Alexey.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest adding to the
> >> 2.11
> >>>>>> scope
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> resolved
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incorrect values of
> >> cache,
> >>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>> groups, data
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> region
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics after
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cluster reactivation.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14990
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 29 июн. 2021 г. в
> >> 15:09,
> >>>>>> Alexey
> >>>>>>>> Gidaspov
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> olive.c...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, we can add this fix
> >> to
> >>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>> scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/06/29 08:36:00,
> >>>> Сурков
> >>>>>>>> Александр
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Викторович<surkov.a....@sberbank.ru.INVALID>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alexey.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think need add
> >> ticket:
> >>>>>>>> JmxMetricExporter
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> fails
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> export
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discovery metrics -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14376
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/06/15 14:43:55,
> >>>>> Alexey
> >>>>>>>> Gidaspov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> o...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Ignite 2.11
> >> Code
> >>>>> Freeze
> >>>>>>>> started
> >>>>>>>>>>>> now>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best wishes,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amelchev Nikita
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best wishes,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amelchev Nikita
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
>

Reply via email to