Pert,

I think for nightly builds this is the only right option for the
suites mentioned above.

On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 14:33, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Maksim.
>
>
> Run All (Nightly) build will run suites with test scale factor 1.0 — will it 
> be a problem?
>
> > On 25 Nov 2021, at 14:22, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > I've merged the PR [1] to the master branch and applied scale factor
> > 0.2 to the tests that were moved to dedicated suites.
> > I've created two suites and added them to the Run.All test suite.
> > - Snapshots [2]
> > - SnapshotsWithIndexes [3]
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/9584/files
> > [2] 
> > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_Snapshots&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=%3Cdefault%3E&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv
> > [3] 
> > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_SnapsohtWithIndexes&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=%3Cdefault%3E&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 15:30, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Igniters,
> >>
> >> Currently, there are a lot of snapshot tests running under the
> >> `Basic3` test suite. Since the amount of tests is actually growing it
> >> is not good to run them at the basic Ignite test suite.
> >>
> >> I propose moving all the tests to a dedicated test suite and running
> >> them independently taking into account that most of them require
> >> TEST_SCALE_FACTOR_PROPERTY to be configured. The default number of
> >> affinity partitions is 1024 and this is too big for TeamCity agents
> >> with slow HDD.
> >>
> >> I've prepared the PR [2] within the issue [1].
> >> Are there any objections to do such changes?
> >>
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15233
> >> [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/9584/files
> >> [3] 
> >> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_DiskPageCompressions1&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=%3Cdefault%3E&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv
>

Reply via email to