Folks,

Should we describe all the WA available for the issue [1]? There is
already a lot of information about CVE, and nevertheless, it will not
be superfluous.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-16101

On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 15:37, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, we need patch our Log4j2 adapter in order to work with
> log4j-2.15
> So there is no choice other than to release 2.11.1
>
> пн, 13 дек. 2021 г. в 15:21, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org>:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > My 200 rubles here,
> > > I want to include it to the 2.12 scope.
> > Why not 2.11.1 as well?
> > We should provide a fixed version for current customers asap.
> > 2.12 require migration, while 2.11.1 can be applied as-is.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 12:18 PM Stephen Darlington <
> > stephen.darling...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Another workaround appears to be using the
> > > -Dlog4j2.formatMsgNoLookups=true option. Also, “Java versions greater
> > than
> > > 6u211, 7u201, 8u191, and 11.0.1 are less affected by this attack vector,
> > at
> > > least in theory, because the JNDI can't load remote code using LDAP.”
> > >
> > > (
> > >
> > https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2021/12/minecraft-and-other-apps-face-serious-threat-from-new-code-execution-bug/
> > > )
> > >
> > > > On 12 Dec 2021, at 10:56, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Igniters,
> > > >
> > > > Preliminary: change of the log4j version does not affect any tests
> > > > (Alexander Nikolaev, correct me if I'm wrong).
> > > >
> > > > If you're using embedded Ignite, it's perfectly possible to enforce
> > > jog4j2
> > > > dependency to be 2.15.0 in your project final pom.xml or build.gradle
> > or
> > > > any other build system properties.
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-16101 ticket seems to be
> > > > a blocker for 2.12. But for now, as a workaround, it's possible to
> > select
> > > > the latest version manually.
> > > >
> > > > Sincerely,
> > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > >
> > > > сб, 11 дек. 2021 г. в 09:47, Nikita Amelchev <namelc...@apache.org>:
> > > >
> > > >> Hello.
> > > >>
> > > >> The issue to update dependency was created:
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-16101
> > > >>
> > > >> I want to include it to the 2.12 scope.
> > > >>
> > > >> сб, 11 дек. 2021 г., 09:19 Raymond Wilson <raymond_wil...@trimble.com
> > >:
> > > >>
> > > >>> All
> > > >>>
> > > >>> This blew up today: CVE-2021-44228 (
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/new-zero-day-exploit-for-log4j-java-library-is-an-enterprise-nightmare/
> > > >>> )
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Will there be a risk assessment with respect to Ignite for this CVE?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> Raymond.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --
> > > >>> <http://www.trimble.com/>
> > > >>> Raymond Wilson
> > > >>> Trimble Distinguished Engineer, Civil Construction Software (CCS)
> > > >>> 11 Birmingham Drive | Christchurch, New Zealand
> > > >>> raymond_wil...@trimble.com
> > > >>>
> > > >>> <
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > https://worksos.trimble.com/?utm_source=Trimble&utm_medium=emailsign&utm_campaign=Launch
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy

Reply via email to