Sorry, forgot to put a -1 vote. On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 11:31 AM Aleksandr Polovtsev < [email protected]> wrote:
> Michael, > > First of all, thanks for the great work, the website looks much better. > However, I've stumbled upon several minor issues: > > 1. "Resources" tab has a "blog" link which literally points to the next > tab, also called "Blog". I think this may be redundant; > 2. > https://ignite.apache.org/suggested-site/features/architectural-foundation/ > contains the "Memory-First Storage" section, which is very confusing to me. > It talks about Raft for AIPERSIST and "version chains for microsecond-level > access" for AIMEM, what does that even mean? > 3. I've noticed that depending on the page, the links in the header can be > completely different (and also broken). For example, go to > https://ignite.apache.org/suggested-site/features/storage and then try to > open any of the links from the header. > 4. The text at the start of the > https://ignite.apache.org/arch/multi-tier-storage.html looks weird, as if > the font size is incorrect, because it looks like a very long header; > 5. https://ignite.apache.org/arch/native-persistence.html has a > configuration example, but it comes from Ignite 2, which may be confusing > for Ignite 3 users; It also talks about WAL, which is an Ignite 2 feature. > This is a common problem for the website, actually, because, for example, > on some pages we mention Raft and storage engines (not present in Ignite > 2), while on the others we mention Ignite 2 features. > 6. https://ignite.apache.org/our-community.html#faq has a "Report An > Issue" section which leads to Ignite 2's repository, there's no link to > Ignite 3 repository; > 7. Some links in the "Features" tab lead to pages on the website, while > others lead directly to documentation (like Continuous Queries), probably > that's a WIP. > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 6:35 PM Michael Aglietti <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Igniters, >> >> The proposed Ignite website and Ignite 3.1.0 documentation sites are >> ready: >> https://ignite.apache.org/suggested-site/ >> >> Thank you to everyone who provided feedback. The complete list of >> feedback issues resolved: >> https://github.com/apache/ignite-website/pull/309 >> >> Note: There are some interactions between the nav bar, the site builder, >> docs URLs and the URL rewrite rules that are not resolvable wile the >> proposed site is in the "proposed-site sub-directory" of the main site. URL >> and link issues will be resolved when the site is moved to the production >> location. >> >> This release updates the ignite-website from PUG to Docusaurus and the >> Ignite 3 documentation from Jekyll to Docusaurus. >> >> Changes to the Ignite Website: >> >> Replatformed the website from PUG to Docusaurus with an updated >> infrastructure, navigation, and component architecture. Updated the >> homepage with ASF 2025 branding, restructured the Use Cases and Features >> sections for Ignite 3, and implemented a blog system with tag filtering. >> >> Changes to Ignite 3 Documentation: >> >> Migrated the documentation from Jekyll/AsciiDoc to Docusaurus/MDX, >> enabling modern documentation features. Reorganized the content into five >> top-level sections (Getting Started, Understand, Develop, Configure and >> Operate, SQL). >> >> Changes to Ignite 2 Documentation: >> >> No changes were made to the Ignite 2 docs, they remain in Jekyll/AsciiDoc. >> >> The vote is formal, see voting guidelines: >> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >> >> - +1 - to accept the suggested Apache Ignite Website rework >> - 0 - don't care either way >> - -1 - DO NOT accept the suggested Apache Ignite Website rework (explain >> why) >> >> This vote is open until Thursday January 29, 2026, 08:00 UTC. >> >> Thank you, >> >> Michael Aglietti > > > > -- > With regards, > Aleksandr Polovtsev > -- With regards, Aleksandr Polovtsev
