Great suggestion on STV - otherwise we might be in the predicament, as Stack has alluded ;)
If STV is accepted for the method of tally then: 1. #579 (I wish the feather was an Apache one!) 2. #560 3. #60 Cos On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 12:56AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 02.11.2014 00:35, Stack wrote: > > Engineers are bad at graphics. > > Yup. Of course, some of us used to spend time in the pits of pre-press, > so we at least have a rough idea about what /not/ to do. Some of the > proposed logos would look great as gas station billboards ... :) > > > If this VOTE comes up with an unsatisfactory > > tally -- there is no overwhelming winner -- then I'd suggest we do some > > reevaluation rather than just take the 'winner'. > > Instead of a plain vote, I suggest we use a variant of STV[1] (which is > used, e.g., to vote for the ASF board[2]). That's more likely to give a > reasonable result. > > My choice then would be: > > 1. #200 > 2. #135 > 3. #560 > > > -- Brane > > P.S.: I'm sure we could use the existing ASF voting tool to tally the > results > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > [2] https://wiki.apache.org/general/BoardVoting
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
