My sentiment exactly. I will comment on the ticket and close it. Thanks, Cos
On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 04:31PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > Thanks Brane, > > I agree. I don't think we need a CMS at this point. Plain PubSub is good > enough for us at this point. > > D. > > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 02.01.2015 19:27, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > > Fellas, > > > > > > do we want to change current svnpub website publishing to CMS one? I > > believe > > > the current method works well, as it doesn't need any extra steps once > > the > > > content is commit. Please chime in on the ticket if you want a change - > > > otherwise it will get closed automatically. > > > > My personal opinion is that our homegrown CMS spontaneously creates a > > sustained region of high-grade vacuum.[1] If PubSub is good enough, I > > suggest to keep that and not complicate matters. > > > > -- Brane > > > > [1] Translation: it sucks. > > > >
