Sorry, I guess you have to be an admin for the project in question to look at it.
Cos On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 02:46PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > Ability to submit for review would suffice. > > By the way, I am not able to look at the link you provided. > > D. > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > In Bigtop, we are using "Patch Available" state for that and it works > > pretty > > well, as far as I can tell. Here's the flow diagram for your attention: > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/BIGTOP/workflows > > > > The case you propose below would be addressed by moving between "In > > Progress" > > and "Patch Available" until the fix is ready to be merged/committed to the > > mainline. > > > > If this is something that might work - and this is pretty standard > > flow, so no one will need to learn the ropes - you can ask INFRA to assign > > this flow to IGNITE project. > > > > Cos > > > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:23AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > > > While we are trying to find a way to customize Jira workflow, in the mean > > > time we need to have a Jira status for issues that need to be > > peer-reviewed > > > by a committer. > > > > > > I propose using Resolve workflow for it. Whenever issue is ready for > > > review, Resolve it and assign to a committer who, in your opinion is the > > > best person to do a review. If the issue passes the review, then it can > > be > > > merged and closed. Otherwise, it should be reopened and assigned back to > > > the developer. > > > > > > Any objections? > > > > > > D. > >
