So, what are our votes? 1) Do not rename 2) Rename to IFS in sprint-1 3) Rename to IFS in further sprints.
If we are OK with "ÏFS" abbreviation I vote for renaming right now because renaming in further sprints will yield in backward compatibility issues (e.g. in XML configs). On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it is OK. > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Sergey Kozlov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > JFYI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Installable_File_System > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > -- > > > Yakov Zhdanov, Director R&D > > > *GridGain Systems* > > > www.gridgain.com > > > > > > 2015-02-12 7:21 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > For whatever reason when I was renaming the file system, I named it > > > > IgniteFs. Now I keep hearing that everyone is calling it IFS ("I" for > > > > Ignite), and it does sound like a better name. > > > > > > > > Does anyone have any objections about calling it IFS? If no, we will > > > have > > > > to rename IgniteFileSystem to IfsFileSystem (and other classes > > > > accordingly). > > > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sergey Kozlov > > GridGain Systems > > www.gridgain.com > > >
