On 04.03.2015 23:47, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:41PM, Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 04.03.2015 23:33, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 02:22PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: >>>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 02:18PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: >>>>>> readme.io is a very cool documentation platform which gives free web >>>>>> hosting, versioning, and sexy looks to open source projects, including >>>>>> Apache projects. It stores documentation in a regular markdown format, >>>>> and >>>>>> I will add the MD files to the GIT tree before doing the next release. >>>>> This >>>>>> way readme.io will be the copy of the documentation stored in github. I >>>>> You meant 'stored in Apache git", didn't you? >>>>> >>>> Yes, the Apache git. >>> It seems to be satisfactory solutio as far as we keep the original docs >>> source >>> in Apache, no? >> There are a couple open questions here: >> >> * While all committers can update the docs, all committers should also >> be able to manage the readme.io site. AFAIK there's no automated way >> to achieve that, and no documented way for adding site >> administrators. That's kind of a bad start. > if readme.io would only be a "mirror" of real docs that issue will sorta go > away, right? As no one would need to manage or change the site?
But that's not the case. Docs in git != online docs, so it's not a mirror, it's the only online source. Tecnically, you can view the docs with 'cat | less' and use your imagination to interpret the CSS and markup ... -- Brane
