On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ah, I see. Yes, I think a better way to go from a pure Maven perspective > is to > bind this sort of generation to assembly step perhaps. Cause 'package' is > expected to produce jar files. What you do with them afterwards - isn't a > 'package' business, IMO. > > Agree. > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:36PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > > It is OK for "mvn package" to generate JAR files. However, in case of > > Ignite, it also generates the release binary ZIP archive which actually > > requires that you are in the root of a valid Ignite GIT tree. I would > > rather have the release ZIP file generated with an additional option > added > > to the "mvn" command. > > > > D. > > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I think package is by default bound to the binary generation, so it > > > would'be > > > pretty messy if you'll try to break this dependency. > > > > > > Cos > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 04:38PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > Based on the latest feedback from the mentors, I think we need to > make > > > sure > > > > that standard "mvn clean package -DskipTests" command can run > > > successfully > > > > by default. This means that that this command should not generate a > > > binary > > > > build by default. > > > > > > > > It is OK to add extra parameters when doing the binary build though. > > > > > > > > How hard would it be to implement this change? > > > > > > > > D. > > > >
