On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote:

> On 29.04.2015 18:42, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Markus Wiesenbacher <
> > mailingl...@codefreun.de> wrote:
> >
> >> You write on your site that GridGain Community Edition powered by Apache
> >> Ignite will have additional bug fixes ... will this version be free? Why
> >> another version and why not bringing those fixes into the general
> Ignite?
> >>
> > Community Edition is free and all the fixes in community edition will be
> > available in Apache Ignite. The benefit of the community edition is that
> it
> > can be released more often than the official Apache Ignite release
> endorsed
> > by ASF, so the community can get the bug fixes faster.
>
> I'm having real trouble understanding this argument. Any bugs would
> first be fixed in Ignite code, yes? Ignite can have an official release
> every hour if you guys are prepared to spend time on that. :)
>

All bugs are fixed in Ignite first, of course. GridGain community edition
just takes the sprint branch of Ignite and can produce a release at any
point, if there are important bug fixes there.  Official ASF release, as we
all know, can take up to 2 weeks for voting and, if there are any
rejections, even longer. There are also many other factors that may delay
the official Apache release.

The only motivation for the community edition is to provide the Ignite user
base with bug fixes much sooner than within 2 weeks.



> If I were a downstream user, I'd interpret "can be released more often"
> as either "bug fixes are not pushed upstream to Ignite" or "these
> releases are less rigorously tested". Neither interpretation sounds very
> palatable.
>
> -- Brane
>

Reply via email to