On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 08:35PM, Ognen Duzlevski wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I think the best way is to write it up here, and one of us will publish it > > on the official documentation site. > > > > I remember when I was starting out with Spark, they had a page (still do) > addressing tuning, configuring, tweaking a Spark install. Overall, I feel > that there is plenty of knowledge in the current Ignite docs, it's just > written with the assumption that people who are reading the docs are also > the Ignite developers ;) > > For example, I asked the question about which ports need to be open on a > network in EC2 and someone was nice enough to answer. I later found the > answer myself here: http://apacheignite.readme.io/v1.0/docs/network-config > > However, the information in the above-referenced page did not "connect with > me" until I got the reply on the list. > > Similarly - I just realized that if you start a cache with .withAsync() and > later call containsKey() on it with a key that I know exists in the cache, > the containsKey() will return false. This, in turn, has caused me to > overwrite the value associated with the key instead of appending to the > value. To make matters more confusing, if a cache is started with > withAsync() and then you obtain a reference to the same, existing cache by > not using withAsync() the containsKey() will work as expected (return true > in my case). This is because the withAsync() applies to the current "user" > of the cache, not to the way the cache was created by the original creator. > VERY confusing! ;) > > I am willing to spend the time and write as much documentation as > necessary. I have many years of experience under my belt, mostly in C but I > made the leap to Scala a while ago. I am willing to learn the Java > necessary to get involved by writing code but for starters I am happy to > just write docs too.
Thank you very much Ognen - that'd be a great contribution to the project and will help a lot of ppl in the future! Dmitriy, do you think we can create some staging on readme.io where such projects could be performed? Something like wiki, essentially? Cos
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
