Sha1 file format is also wrong again. It's very frustrating to keep asking to fix it for last 6 months. I'm abstaining from the vote
-0 [binding] Cos On July 13, 2015 7:31:23 AM PDT, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[email protected]> wrote: >I think we should just stop using MD5 Hash and just keep using SHA1. In >my >experience, the MD5 format is different on different operating systems, >while the SHA1 works the same in most of the cases. > >D. > >On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> I'll take a look. Thanks, Brane! >> >> --Yakov >> >> 2015-07-13 11:27 GMT+03:00 Branko Čibej <[email protected]>: >> >> > On 12.07.2015 08:18, Branko Čibej wrote: >> > > On 11.07.2015 02:00, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> > >> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 01:56AM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote: >> > >>> Dear Sirs! >> > >> If you're trying to please IPMC gramma-busybodies with this - >don't >> > bother: >> > >> they will find a reason why that isn't an appropriate way to >address >> > them ;) >> > > I'm more interested in why 1.3.0-rc1 is still in dist/dev. You >should >> > > really immediately delete packages that aren't candidates for >release, >> > > anything else just creates confusion. >> > >> > Sigh. The SHA1 and MD5 file format is still wrong. Please either >look it >> > up if you're faking the format, or use the correct tools to >generate it. >> > >> > Specifically, there should be two spaces between the hash and the >file >> > name. >> > >> > -- Brane >> > >>
