On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Sergi Vladykin <sergi.vlady...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I was thinking about protecting users from doing stupid things,
> but ok, we can do a broadcast as well.
>

I think we should print out a warning in this case for sure. Is there a
Jira created for this? We should provide a link to this discussion there.


>
> Sergi
>
> 2015-08-08 3:46 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>:
>
> > Sergi,
> >
> > I personally don't like that for certain types of queries we will be
> > throwing an exception.
> >
> > After analyzing the approaches you suggested, I can think of cases where
> A
> > performs better than B, as well as when B performs better than A.
> >
> > However, if you prefer B, I don't mind us taking that approach. As you
> have
> > mentioned yourself, in case of non-collocated non-affinity-ID queries,
> you
> > would require a broadcast which is a performance hit. I still vote that
> we
> > take this performance hit and do the broadcast (optimized with batching,
> of
> > course), and execute the query instead of throwing an exception.
> >
> > D.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Sergi Vladykin <sergi.vlady...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Alexey,
> > >
> > > 1. Yes, in my plan it should work exactly like that: if both keys in
> join
> > > are affinity keys, then we are fully collocated, if only one then we
> can
> > > run join remotely as described, if none of them we will fail to run the
> > > query.
> > >
> > > 2. I mean we don't have values for these affinity keys in our local
> query
> > > result to map requests to remote nodes.
> > > Example:
> > > Lest say we have 4 partitioned tables:
> > > - Organization(id) with affinity key `id`.
> > > - Person(id, orgId, name) with affinity key `orgId` (it means that it
> > will
> > > be collocated with `Organization`)
> > > - Manufacturer(id) with affinity key `id`.
> > > - Purchase(id, personId, manufId) with affinity key `manufId`
> (collocated
> > > with `Manufacturer`)
> > >
> > > As you can see `Purchase` has a reference to a `Person` and we may want
> > to
> > > join them by this reference in a query like this:
> > >
> > > SELECT pe.name FROM Person pe JOIN Purchase pu ON pe.id = pu.personId
> > > WHERE
> > > pu.id = ?
> > >
> > > as you can see neither `pe.id` nor `pu.personId` is an affinity key
> > here.
> > > But if the `Person` has affinity key `id` and thus is not collocated
> with
> > > `Organization`
> > > we can run query on `Purchase`, take value of `personId` and find the
> > > affinity node to get the needed `Person`.
> > >
> > > Of course it is a restriction but there are multiple ways to workaround
> > it,
> > > so I don't think it is really a problem:
> > >
> > > 1. Use primary key as affinity key if table is used in such joins. This
> > way
> > > `Person` still can be joined to `Organization`
> > > (less effective though) and `Pusrchase` can be joined to `Person` as
> > well.
> > > 2. Use denormalization: instread of having `Purchase.personId` store
> > > `Person` object itself there.
> > > 3. Introduce another entity which can duplicate data from `Person` but
> > have
> > > collocation needed for this failing query:
> > > For our example it can be an entity PersonForPurchace(id, manufId,
> name)
> > > with the same affinity key `manufId` as `Purchase`.
> > > This way our query can be rewritten in fully collocated style:
> > >
> > > SELECT pe.name FROM PersonForPurchace pe JOIN Purchase pu ON pe.id =
> > > pu.personId AND pu.manufId = pe.manufId WHERE pu.id = ?
> > >
> > > Sergi
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2015-08-07 11:42 GMT+03:00 Alexey Kuznetsov <akuznet...@gridgain.com>:
> > >
> > > > Sergi,
> > > >
> > > > Questions about plan "B" :)
> > > > 1) It is possible to throw exception on query prepare state (fail
> fast)
> > > > when
> > > > we don't know remote affinity key?
> > > > 2) Could you provide an example when we don't know remote affinity
> > key? I
> > > > think we always have some default affinity (no?)?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Alexey Kuznetsov
> > > > GridGain Systems
> > > > www.gridgain.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to