If this is high priority, do you want to start 3.0 planning? On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Alexander Behm <[email protected]> wrote:
> Of course there's always the option of committing to master and then > reverting it in point-release branches, but that means we'll need to not > forget to do that. > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Alexander Behm <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I meant doing it in a point release. > > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Dimitris Tsirogiannis < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I think this is a good idea. Maybe we should do it in the next major > >> release (v3) instead of a point release, unless that's what you meant. > >> > >> Dimitris > >> > >> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Alexander Behm < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Reserving standard SQL keywords seems like a reasonable thing to do, > but > >>> it > >>> is an incompatible change. I think it should be ok to include the > change > >>> in > >>> the next Impala release (whatever comes after 2.11), but wanted to hear > >>> other opinions. > >>> > >>> See: > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-3916 > >>> > >> > >> > > >
