Ah ok, so the current parsing/analysis pipeline didn't anticipate that the
internal type of an expression might need to be decided at analysis time
rather than parsing time. Yeah makes sense that it's not a newbie task then.

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Alexander Behm <alex.b...@cloudera.com>
wrote:

> I suppose it can be made to be not incompatible, but with a non-newbie
> effort. The "||" is parsed as a CompoundPredicate today and we cannot
> decide at parse time whether "||" is used as OR or as CONCAT. So the
> easiest solution is to pick one variant and go with it.
>
> Determining the variant later during compilation requires deeper changes.
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Tim Armstrong <tarmstr...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Why is it incompatible?
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Alexander Behm <alex.b...@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > IMPALA-452 is not a good candidate because it's an incompatible change,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Tim Armstrong <
> tarmstr...@cloudera.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Here are a few JIRAs that might be good starters:
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-6844 (bug in builtin
> > > > function)
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-6393 (adding a small
> > > > improvement to impala-shell)
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-6234 (fixing a bug in
> > query
> > > > analysis)
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-452 (adding || as
> string
> > > > concat operator - a little more advanced)
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:07 AM, Jim Apple <jbap...@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I asked on 5610 if it's a duplicate with the ticket that
> > > > > https://gerrit.cloudera.org/c/9173 resolves.
> > > > >
> > > > > 5392 has two open patches: https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/10032/
> > and
> > > > > https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/10040/. I have encouraged the
> > authors
> > > to
> > > > > work together or to pick one and go with it.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:21 AM, Gabor Kaszab <
> > > gaborkas...@cloudera.com
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I see.
> > > > > > If those are in progress, can someone be assigned to their Jira
> and
> > > the
> > > > > > status of them be set to "In Progress" to avoid any
> > misunderstanding?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Gabor
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Fredy Wijaya <
> > fwij...@cloudera.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Unfortunately those two tickets are not available either.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-5392 (currently
> in
> > > > > progress
> > > > > > > https://gerrit.cloudera.org/c/10032/)
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-5610 (has already
> > > been
> > > > > > > completed in https://gerrit.cloudera.org/c/9173)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We have tickets that are labelled newbie:
> https://issues.apache.
> > > > > > > org/jira/browse/IMPALA-6844?jql=project%20%3D%20IMPALA%
> > > > > > > 20AND%20labels%20%3D%20newbie%20AND%20assignee%20in%20(EMPTY)
> > for
> > > > > anyone
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > grab.
> > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 1:50 AM, Gabor Kaszab <
> > > > > gaborkas...@cloudera.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hey,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > As I see that task just got an assignee (abhishek at
> > > > sigmoidanalytics
> > > > > > dot
> > > > > > > > com) yesterday so I'm afraid it is not free to pick up
> anymore.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I found 2 Impala related tasks from helpwanted.apache.org
> that
> > > are
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > > assigned to anyone:
> > > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-5392
> > > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-5610
> > > > > > > > Are you interested in any of them?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Jim, As I see the issues with an assignee still appear in the
> > > > > > > > helpwanted.apache.org search list (these are still in Open
> > > state,
> > > > > > > though).
> > > > > > > > Is this intentional? Shouldn't those disappear once the issue
> > > gets
> > > > an
> > > > > > > > assignee?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > Gabor
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 8:02 AM, Kayli Jiang <
> > > > kayliji...@icloud.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I would like to help out with the task listed at
> > > > > > > > > https://helpwanted.apache.org/task.html?544bf69e
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to