Ah ok, so the current parsing/analysis pipeline didn't anticipate that the internal type of an expression might need to be decided at analysis time rather than parsing time. Yeah makes sense that it's not a newbie task then.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Alexander Behm <alex.b...@cloudera.com> wrote: > I suppose it can be made to be not incompatible, but with a non-newbie > effort. The "||" is parsed as a CompoundPredicate today and we cannot > decide at parse time whether "||" is used as OR or as CONCAT. So the > easiest solution is to pick one variant and go with it. > > Determining the variant later during compilation requires deeper changes. > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Tim Armstrong <tarmstr...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > > > Why is it incompatible? > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Alexander Behm <alex.b...@cloudera.com> > > wrote: > > > > > IMPALA-452 is not a good candidate because it's an incompatible change, > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Tim Armstrong < > tarmstr...@cloudera.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Here are a few JIRAs that might be good starters: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-6844 (bug in builtin > > > > function) > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-6393 (adding a small > > > > improvement to impala-shell) > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-6234 (fixing a bug in > > query > > > > analysis) > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-452 (adding || as > string > > > > concat operator - a little more advanced) > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:07 AM, Jim Apple <jbap...@cloudera.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I asked on 5610 if it's a duplicate with the ticket that > > > > > https://gerrit.cloudera.org/c/9173 resolves. > > > > > > > > > > 5392 has two open patches: https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/10032/ > > and > > > > > https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/10040/. I have encouraged the > > authors > > > to > > > > > work together or to pick one and go with it. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:21 AM, Gabor Kaszab < > > > gaborkas...@cloudera.com > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I see. > > > > > > If those are in progress, can someone be assigned to their Jira > and > > > the > > > > > > status of them be set to "In Progress" to avoid any > > misunderstanding? > > > > > > > > > > > > Gabor > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Fredy Wijaya < > > fwij...@cloudera.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately those two tickets are not available either. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-5392 (currently > in > > > > > progress > > > > > > > https://gerrit.cloudera.org/c/10032/) > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-5610 (has already > > > been > > > > > > > completed in https://gerrit.cloudera.org/c/9173) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We have tickets that are labelled newbie: > https://issues.apache. > > > > > > > org/jira/browse/IMPALA-6844?jql=project%20%3D%20IMPALA% > > > > > > > 20AND%20labels%20%3D%20newbie%20AND%20assignee%20in%20(EMPTY) > > for > > > > > anyone > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > grab. > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 1:50 AM, Gabor Kaszab < > > > > > gaborkas...@cloudera.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I see that task just got an assignee (abhishek at > > > > sigmoidanalytics > > > > > > dot > > > > > > > > com) yesterday so I'm afraid it is not free to pick up > anymore. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found 2 Impala related tasks from helpwanted.apache.org > that > > > are > > > > > not > > > > > > > > assigned to anyone: > > > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-5392 > > > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-5610 > > > > > > > > Are you interested in any of them? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jim, As I see the issues with an assignee still appear in the > > > > > > > > helpwanted.apache.org search list (these are still in Open > > > state, > > > > > > > though). > > > > > > > > Is this intentional? Shouldn't those disappear once the issue > > > gets > > > > an > > > > > > > > assignee? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Gabor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 8:02 AM, Kayli Jiang < > > > > kayliji...@icloud.com> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to help out with the task listed at > > > > > > > > > https://helpwanted.apache.org/task.html?544bf69e > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
