Thank you Laszlo for starting the discussion. Just want to add that we also have Impala 5 EPIC Jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-12674
For any Impala 5 TODO, feel free to file an IMPALA Jira and tag "Impala 5" as the Epic Link. Regards, Riza On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 12:55 PM Laszlo Gaal <lasz...@apache.org> wrote: > As mentioned earlier in > https://lists.apache.org/thread/96t7l66x8hlc5dswyt4g1mpn6wr5op4z, I would > like to start a discussion about Impala deprecating support for older > technologies that were retired by their creators: > - Python 2: Officially retired on Jan 1st, 2020 ( > https://www.python.org/doc/sunset-python-2) > Operating system versions: > - CentOS 7: End of Maintenance reached on June 30th, 2024 ( > > https://blog.centos.org/2023/04/end-dates-are-coming-for-centos-stream-8-and-centos-linux-7/ > , https://endoflife.date/centos) > - SLES 12: General support for 12.5 (the last minor release) ended on Oct > 31st, 2024 > - Ubuntu 16.04: Standard support ended in April 2021 ( > https://ubuntu.com/about/release-cycle) > - Ubuntu 18.04: Standard support ended in April 2023 > Client connectivity: > - support for the Beeswax client protocol: the default protocol for > impala-shell was changed to HS2 in August 2020 > (commit 179b14876d13353302d075be13f0ed1145041bfa), almost five years ago. > This should have been long enough for all existing Impala clients to > embrace HS2 as the client protocol, so Beeswax can now be marked for > removal in the future. > > - Support for Java 8 is another interesting question. Major OpenJDK > rebuilds (Red Hat, Eclipse Temurin) show Java 8 support for 12-18 months > moreIceberg removed support for Java 8 starting with their 1.7.0 release, > so Impala will need to consider this any time we want to pick up any > Iceberg release higher than 1.6.x. Considering all this, I don't think we > need to make a decision on Java 8 support right now. > > Removing support for the above list certainly qualifies as a breaking > change, which would prompt a major version change. > The currently running Impala 4.5.0 release still contains support for all > of the above, so this release could be a good opportunity to branch Impala > 4.x and start working on Impala v5. > > This is a bit like the way Impala 4.x was started with > https://lists.apache.org/thread/vkq8b4sb4j7x8yykbr92rw8c97k9n94q; so in a > similar way I propose the following list: > - release Impala 4.5.0 (the current release) with release notes expressly > deprecating an agreed-upon set of technologies, > - bump the version number to 5.0 on the master branch, > - open the gates for breaking changes > - eventually release v5.0 with breaking changes > > Creating a 4.x branch could be the subject of a separate (but related) > discussion. > > Please share your thoughts, > Thank you, > > - LaszloG >