Thank you Laszlo for starting the discussion.
Just want to add that we also have Impala 5 EPIC Jira
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-12674

For any Impala 5 TODO, feel free to file an IMPALA Jira and tag "Impala 5"
as the Epic Link.

Regards,
Riza

On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 12:55 PM Laszlo Gaal <lasz...@apache.org> wrote:

> As mentioned earlier in
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/96t7l66x8hlc5dswyt4g1mpn6wr5op4z, I would
> like to start a discussion about Impala deprecating support for older
> technologies that were retired by their creators:
> - Python 2: Officially retired on Jan 1st, 2020 (
> https://www.python.org/doc/sunset-python-2)
> Operating system versions:
> - CentOS 7: End of Maintenance reached on June 30th, 2024 (
>
> https://blog.centos.org/2023/04/end-dates-are-coming-for-centos-stream-8-and-centos-linux-7/
> , https://endoflife.date/centos)
> - SLES 12: General support for 12.5 (the last minor release) ended on Oct
> 31st, 2024
> - Ubuntu 16.04: Standard support ended in April 2021 (
> https://ubuntu.com/about/release-cycle)
> - Ubuntu 18.04: Standard support ended in April 2023
> Client connectivity:
> - support for the Beeswax client protocol: the default protocol for
> impala-shell was changed to HS2 in August 2020
> (commit 179b14876d13353302d075be13f0ed1145041bfa), almost five years ago.
> This should have been long enough for all existing Impala clients to
> embrace HS2 as the client protocol, so Beeswax can now be marked for
> removal in the future.
>
> - Support for Java 8 is another interesting question. Major OpenJDK
> rebuilds (Red Hat, Eclipse Temurin) show Java 8 support for 12-18 months
> moreIceberg removed support for Java 8 starting with their 1.7.0 release,
> so Impala will need to consider this any time we want to pick up any
> Iceberg release higher than 1.6.x. Considering all this, I don't think we
> need to make a decision on Java 8 support right now.
>
> Removing support for the above list certainly qualifies as a breaking
> change, which would prompt a major version change.
> The currently running Impala 4.5.0 release still contains support for all
> of the above, so this release could be a good opportunity to branch Impala
> 4.x and start working on Impala v5.
>
> This is a bit like the way Impala 4.x was started with
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/vkq8b4sb4j7x8yykbr92rw8c97k9n94q; so in a
> similar way I propose the following list:
> - release Impala 4.5.0 (the current release) with release notes expressly
> deprecating an agreed-upon set of technologies,
> - bump the version number to 5.0 on the master branch,
> - open the gates for breaking changes
> - eventually release v5.0 with breaking changes
>
> Creating a 4.x branch could be the subject of a separate (but related)
> discussion.
>
> Please share your thoughts,
> Thank you,
>
>   - LaszloG
>

Reply via email to