-1 (binding) Ran the release-test-ub2004 job on Jenkins, which failed: Unfortunately there is a mistake in the release tarball: the top directory inside the tarball is called apache-impala-x.y.z instead of the expected apache-impala-4.5.0. Perhaps https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/How+to+Release was followed a bit too closely :)
Although I'm not sure if fixing this would call for a new release candidate, but the new tarball would surely require a new signature, so the cleanest way forward may still be to cut a new release. Thanks, - LaszloG On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 3:16 PM Peter Rozsa <pro...@apache.org> wrote: > This is a vote for Impala 4.5.0 release. > > The artifacts for testing can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/impala/4.5.0/RC2/ > > Git tag: 4.5.0-rc2 < > https://github.com/apache/impala/releases/tag/4.4.1-rc1> > https://github.com/apache/impala/releases/tag/4.5.0-rc2 > > Tree hash: 6b9785ea94ba496a0418bbda10cbcb0d3ece1b56 > > Release manager: prozsa > > Artifacts were signed with the 869DF5BED2FB82F2 key which can be found in > > https://downloads.apache.org/impala/KEYS. > > Please vote +1 or -1. -1 votes should be accompanied by an explanation of > > the reason. Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community > > members are encouraged to cast non-binding votes. This vote will pass if > > there are 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes. > > Voting is open for 72 hours (excluding weekends). > > This wiki page describes how to check the release before you vote: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/How+to+Release#HowtoRelease-HowtoVoteonaReleaseCandidate > > I tested this by running CORE tests: > https://jenkins.impala.io/job/parallel-all-tests-ub2004/2075/ > > Fixes included in RC2: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-13728 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-13742 > > Also, after fixing IMPALA-13742 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-13742>, I tested that both > CentOS7 and Redhat 8 packaging are working. > > Discussion thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/1bxlnr822s7zqbyljzkwqg8qbj914b1t > > RC1 thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/vv351njlk44p4hf8zw0pvqxp9m3blshl > > Thanks, Peter >
