Thanks for volunteering. The remaining issues seem pretty small. I've
picked up one.

On Tue, Sep 15, 2026 at 2:16 AM Noémi Pap-Takács <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I agree that it is time to release the new features. Since they also
> introduced a lot of breaking changes, this is a good opportunity to release
> them in a major version.
> I volunteer to be the release manager for Impala 5.0.0.
>
> Currently, the following issues are tracked with "Target Version": "Impala
> 5.0.0":
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues?jql=project%20%3D%20IMPALA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20%22Target%20Version%22%20%3D%20%22Impala%205.0.0%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20ASC
>
> If any critical fix or breaking change must be included in Impala 5, please
> add it to the list.
> I would like to propose a release candidate in 1-2 weeks.
>
> Please assess the documentation impact of your changes since Impala 4.5.0
> and update the documentation if needed.
>
> Thank you,
> Noémi
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 3:23 PM Zoltán Borók-Nagy <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Everyone,
> >
> > It's been a while since we released Impala 4.5.0.
> >
> > Since then lots of great improvements and features accumulated on the
> > master branch. It would be nice if we could release them in a new major
> > version: Impala 5.
> >
> > First, let's collect all the required items for the release, especially the
> > breaking changes.
> > Please, if you want any of your tickets to be included in Impala 5, set the
> > "Target Version" to "Impala 5.0.0" and "Priority" to "Blocker" or
> > "Critical".
> >
> > Currently we have these items:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20IMPALA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20priority%20in%20(Blocker%2C%20Critical)%20AND%20%22Target%20Version%22%20%3D%20%22Impala%205.0.0%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20ASC
> >
> > Please also let us know if you volunteer to be the release manager.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >     Zoltan
> >

Reply via email to