On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Henry Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: > I didn't think that binaries were uploaded to any repository, but instead > to S3 (and therefore there's no version history) or some other URL. That's > what I'd suggest we continue to do. >
A bit of a tangent (but important if we will rely even more on toolchain: the fact that the binaries (and clean source) are only copied to S3 seems like a problem. What happens if someone accidentally 'rm -rf' the toolchain bucket? Can we reproduce our old build exactly? Are we at least backing up the S3 toolchain bucket somehow?
