Also, you asked > I'm wondering whether have you ever test these two cases.
I do not know. Can you check and report back what you find? On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Jim Apple <[email protected]> wrote: >> What's more, in this patch, we can use only standard ASCII characters(with >> decimal value from 0 to 127) in ascii or octal format to set filed >> terminator, but not extended ASCII characters(with decimal value from 128 to >> 255) or standard ASCII characters in unicode, decimal or hexadecimal format. > > Today, can field terminators be set to extended ASCIII characters (not > with octal, but raw)?
