How about not changing the code? Is there any reason they have to be gapless?
On 20 October 2016 at 16:12, Lars Volker <[email protected]> wrote: > When backporting a change that introduced a new error code to an older > version Impala there seem to be two options to prevent gaps in the error > codes: > > > - Change the error code number during the backport. This will result in > different error codes between versions > - Backport all new error codes that have been introduced prior to that > change, so that the error code stays the same. > > Are there other alternatives? Which way should I go? > > Thanks, Lars > -- Henry Robinson Software Engineer Cloudera 415-994-6679
