Hi All,
  I just wanted to follow up on the previous emails about starting the code
review process for your Impala patches. We'd really like the process to go
as smoothly as possible

One thing we really need to figure out is how we might test and maintain
PPC code. We only really have access to x86 build infra and it isn't
feasible for us to maintain PPC code that we can't test. It's a burden on
contributors who want to touch the code and gain confidence they're not
breaking anything, and also on PPC devs who will likely get accidentally
broken repeatedly.

I'm also concerned making sure that the code review process goes as
smoothly as possible, since each iteration can take a lot of time,
especially if we're working across different time zones. We have a fairly
high bar for code quality and maintainability, and in our experience it
takes a bit of time for contributors to calibrate for that and post code
reviews that can get through the process smoothly.

I'd suggest that you should identify some small platform-agnostic fixes in
your patchsets and start off with posting code reviews for those. That way
we can make progress and get you ramped up on the code review process
before we've resolved the more difficult PPC testing questions.

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/Contributing+to+Impala
is our main reference for the process.

Thanks,
Tim

Reply via email to