Hi! good question. Adding UDAnFs certainly seems useful, but we have no immediate plans of adding them. We're happy to help you contribute!
May I ask what UDAnFs you are looking at? Perhaps there is a way to satisfy your use case without full-fledged support for UDAnFs. Alex On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 7:42 PM, 吴朱华 <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys: > > Some of my clients are consider switching from vertica to impala, but they > really need the UDAnF to speed up the query. Is there any plans for > supporting UDAnF?^_^ >
