The ask in this issue seems kind of specific and contained. But should we expand to cover lazy year and lazy time as well?
i.e. 90-9-28 or, 90-9-28 1:20:5
- IMPALA-5315: Allowing Lazy date/month in timestamp (YYYY-M-D) Vincent Tran
The ask in this issue seems kind of specific and contained. But should we expand to cover lazy year and lazy time as well?
i.e. 90-9-28 or, 90-9-28 1:20:5