Could you point me to the failing job? I couldn't see it obviously on https://jenkins.impala.io/.
On 24 July 2017 at 17:42, Jim Apple <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, ASAN in the current 1404 job fails with something about linking. I > haven't got around to investigating in detail. > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Is it possible that the issue here is due to a "one definition rule" > > violation? eg something like > > https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerOneDefinitionR > > uleViolation > > Another similar thing is described here: > > https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerInitialization > > OrderFiasco > > > > ASAN with the appropriate flags might help expose if one of the above is > > related. > > > > I wonder whether it is a kind of coincidence that it is fine in a static > > build but causes problems in dynamic, and at some point the static link > > order may slightly shift, causing another new subtle bug. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Henry Robinson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > We've started seeing isolated incidences of IMPALA-5702 during GVOs, > > where > > > a custom cluster test fails by throwing an exception during locale > > > handling. > > > > > > I've been able to reproduce this locally, but only with shared linking > > > enabled (which makes sense since the issue is symptomatic of a global > > c'tor > > > not getting called the right number of times). > > > > > > It's probable that my patch for IMPALA-5659 exposed this (since it > > forced a > > > more correct linking strategy for thirdparty libraries when dynamic > > linking > > > was enabled), but it looks to me at first glance like there were latent > > > dynamic linking bugs that we weren't getting hit by. Fixing IMPALA-5702 > > > will probably take a while, and I don't think we should hold up GVOs or > > put > > > them at risk. > > > > > > So there are two options: > > > > > > 1. Revert IMPALA-5659 > > > > > > 2. Switch GVO to static linking > > > > > > IMPALA-5659 is important to commit the kudu util library, which is > needed > > > for the KRPC work. Without it, shared linking doesn't work *at all* > when > > > the kudu util library is committed. > > > > > > Static linking doesn't take much longer in my unscientific > measurements, > > > and is closer to how Impala is actually used. In the interest of > forward > > > progress I'd like to try switching ubuntu-14.04-from-scratch to use > > static > > > linking while I work on IMPALA-5702. > > > > > > What does everyone else think? > > > > > > Henry > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Todd Lipcon > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > >
