gosonzhang opened a new issue, #10066: URL: https://github.com/apache/inlong/issues/10066
### Description After using DataProxy for a while, I found that the definition of configuration-related keys in CommonConfigHolder.java is not very reasonable. Some names are mixed with upper and lower case, some are in camel case, and some keys belong to the same type of operation but are not categorized by name, etc. In terms of configuration settings, some configurations are too complex, making it inconvenient for users. These issues are not user-friendly and hinder the user experience. I plan to optimize the configuration definition based on my usage experience, adjusting it according to the categories and themes of usage, such as unifying lowercase, separating key names with ".", allowing users to quickly understand which type of configuration definition it is based on the name. However, I also noticed that some of the configuration definitions and usage in this class are not settings of the DataProxy node itself but are defined by common components. These parts should not be modified but should be adjusted at a higher level. ### InLong Component InLong DataProxy ### Are you willing to submit PR? - [X] Yes, I am willing to submit a PR! ### Code of Conduct - [X] I agree to follow this project's [Code of Conduct](https://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@inlong.apache.org.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
