HiI'm forwarding this to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] project. Sorry for the delay...
Louis On 2005-10-21, at 12:10 , Alvin Kennedy wrote:
If the developers are not willing to revert back to the original installer, please discuss addressing the following issues: 1) Explain to the community the justification for moving to rpm based installation packages. This is a potentially divisive issue in the community. 2) Label the packages as rpm instead of tar. You wouldn't want someone labeling a .odf formatted file .doc. Thank you for considering this issue, which IMHO is only generating unnecessary resentment in the community. This is the time for us all to come together to celebrate a really great piece of open soource software. Thank you Alvin
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
